Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Metternech

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Metternech}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Metternech

main edit links history watch
Filed: 16:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: G

User:Elvisandhismagicpelvis was blocked last week for running a sockfarm - Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Elvisandhismagicpelvis. I strongly suppect that Metternech (talk · contribs) is the latest attempt to get around the ban. This person has a long history of pushing his/her POV that Rugby league is "football" despite talk to the contrary on the debate here Talk:Sport_in_Australia#rugby_league_football. As usual this editor likes to state that anyone not agreeing with them is a vandal. See the comments on this edit as an example. Could an admin please confirm/deny that this is the user getting around yet another ban. Thanks. Tancred 16:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Changed code from B to G as there is no arbcom case (or community ban), but the user feels a check is needed. Kwsn(Ni!) 05:11, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Additional information needed. Please provide more information as to why you think a check is required, such as diffs linking their behaviour together. Quite a lot of people call people that disagree with them vandals, that alone is nothing unusual. --Deskana (apples) 16:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Dunno if this helps, but a previous request involving elvis is archived here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tomasthetankengine. Kwsn(Ni!) 03:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Declined. No evidence provided in over a week. --Deskana (talky) 21:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.