Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mattinbgn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<noinclude>
[edit] Mattinbgn
main edit links history watch Filed: 04:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC) |
- Mattinbgn (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- 203.33.164.116 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: G
- Supporting evidence: [1] Anon uncivil personal attacks here coincident with named user's stalk-reversions of many of my edits. Helpful if this may identify of exonerate. Any questions, feel free to ask me. [2] tracks the anon to Camberwell, Victoria. Named user identifies to involvement with multiple Australian wikiprojects. Pimpbrutha (talk) 03:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Notified by Pimpbrutha (talk) , Merry Christmas :)
- Declined. Trolling, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Blocked off talkpage. Nice one, User:Blnguyen. How is it you can say that this manner of abusing ever can be covered up or just brushed off like you do here? Don't make 'trolling' accusation when I'm the one being abuse as 'sad', 'pathetic' for supply up-to-date newspaper refs and summary.MostPimpBruthr (talk) 11:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Request was improperly formatted. It is formatted correctly now. Nishkid64 (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Clerk note: Pimpbrutha (talk · contribs) and Destroyerofthewiki (talk · contribs) were blocked indefinitely as username violations. MostPimpBruthr (talk · contribs) was blocked indefinitely for continuous edit warring, BLP violations and trolling. Pimpbrutha and MostPimpBruthr have been tagged as sockpuppets of Destroyerofthewiki. Nishkid64 (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Note all of the above are now identified as sockpuppets of DavidYork71, along with a heap of others. Mattinbgn is a solid regular at various Australian WikiProjects and I'm not entirely sure why David has embarked on such a campaign against him. Orderinchaos 10:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Blocked off talkpage. Nice one, User:Blnguyen. How is it you can say that this manner of abusing ever can be covered up or just brushed off like you do here? Don't make 'trolling' accusation when I'm the one being abuse as 'sad', 'pathetic' for supply up-to-date newspaper refs and summary.MostPimpBruthr (talk) 11:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
</noinclude>