Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mardavich
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Mardavich
main edit links history watch Filed: 18:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC) |
- Mardavich (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Jamaana (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: D
User:Jamaana registered after the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian-Udi was on Wikipedia:articles for deletion and voted delete just the same as Mardavich did. Jamaana left wikipedia after the article was deleted on Feb 14th. Why I suspect that Jamaana might be a sockpuppet of Mardavich is that jamaana's contributions was on articles related to Turkey or Armenia but there is a unique contribution on Mohammad al-Fazari article where Mardavich was having an "edit war" there. --Deersony 18:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Additional information needed Is the questionable vote the deciding vote in the AfD? The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think so.--Deersony 16:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Clerk note: As per the CheckUser listing instructions for code letters at the top of this page, unless the vote where fraud is suspected affected the outcome of the (in this case) AfD, then it doesn't require a CheckUser, and you should list it on the Administrators noticeboard for Incidents: here. — Deon555talkdesksign here! 23:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Further evidence: User:Mardavich is charged with edit warring on one of the sides in the ArbCom case [1]. There are some examples on that presented here [2] and [3], although User:Mardavich initially denied any involvement in Azerbaijan-Armenia related articles [4]. Clearly, as presented evidence of revert warring shows, it wasn't so. In this light, I would not be surprised if the user also utilized socks to tip the voting on Azerbaijan-Armenia related article in the favor of one of the sides. Atabek 18:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Declined per clerk note. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 23:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.