Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lendiggy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lendiggy}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Lendiggy

main edit links history watch
Filed: 00:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: G

User:Lendiggy is attempting to replace a free-use image (Image:Daphne Rosen 2.jpg) on the page Daphne Rosen with one that currently has no license nor any source (Image:Daphne Rosen AVN 2007.jpg‎) as seen here and here. Alternately he blanks out the free-use image altogether as seen here.

The same blanking edits have been observed by User:75.80.36.85 as seen here.

Then User:Daphnerosen begins editing and shows the exact same edit pattern as Lendiggy: adding the same photo with no license or source (as seen here) or blanking the existing free use one (as seen here and here).

My thesis is that Lendiggy created the account Daphnerosen in an attempt to try and have his/her unacceptable edits by making them seem as though they were being done by the subject of the article itself. Additionally, the IP 75.80.36.85 will turn out to be the source IP for both Lendiggy and Daphnerosen. Tabercil 00:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note:: I don't see a checkuser case here. It's evident that Lendiggy's last edit before this incident was in 2006, and the other users have no unrelated edits. Thus, it is fairly certain that these are all the same person. I see sufficient grounds to block Daphnerosen (talk · contribs), the newer account, but otherwise this is just a content dispute. Shalom Hello 21:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply. I see that since I made the checkuser request, the user Daphnerosen has uploaded a picture with the license PD-self, and an edit summary that starts off by saying "I am Daphne Rosen, verifiable by my official email address, Daphne@DaphneRosen.com..." The question now now presented is "Is Daphnerosen indeed Daphne Rosen?" and that question's best answered elsewhere. Tabercil 23:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed. Of course. Voice-of-All 18:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.