Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LegoAxiom1007

[edit] LegoAxiom1007

• LegoAxiom1007 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Xterra1 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of LegoAxiom1007
• Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of LegoAxiom1007
• Code letter: F

Just a strange feeling after looking at some of his edits (a similarity in censoring comments at least).—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Declined. LegoAxiom1007 is stale. Mackensen (talk) 00:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LegoAxiom1007

• LegoAxiom1007 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Future54 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Saturation2 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of LegoAxiom1007
• Code letter: F

Possible sockpuppet of LegoAxiom1007 (talk · contribs), who has been indefinitely blocked for repeated disruption, misuse of automatic scripts, frivolous WP:RFP and WP:AIV reports, and refusal to listen to requests to cease his activities. Future54 exhibits similar patterns, including:

• Very few mainspace contributions
• Immediate implementation of stuff in monobook.js
• Autographs
• Similarly frivolous reports to AIV
• Edits to car articles and youth television
• Immediate helpme requests

LegoAxiom1007's block has been further discussed here. Thanks, – Riana ^ऋ 04:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Just to say that I'm familiar with the blocked user's pattern of disruption and I agree that Future54 seems to fit that pattern pretty well. Moreschi ^{Want some help? Ask!} 14:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree, as well, especially after the frivolous RFPP reports started up. -Amarkov moo! 16:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Moved from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Future54 to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LegoAxiom1007 to match alleged puppetmaster. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Saturation2 said he was LegoAxiom's brother, are we sure they are the same person? Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 01:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Meatpuppet, sockpuppet, same thing to me. Nardman1 03:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: Sockpuppet case filed Nardman1 03:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• More related discussion at ANI [1]. Nardman1 03:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed, also Sant99876 (talk · contribs). Dmcdevit·t 07:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LegoAxiom1007

• LegoAxiom1007 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter:G

User is pretending to be a newbie and is pretending to be "learning" how to use Wikipedia, and is vandalizing Wikipedia and getting away with it in the process. Experienced editors "excuse" this user as a newbie (see Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard#Proposal_to_ban_User:LegoAxiom1007) although at least one other person agrees this user is not a newbie User_talk:Nardman1#User:LegoAxiom1007. Nardman1 02:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Request checkuser to see if this is a sock of a known user. Nardman1 02:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser is not for fishing --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 03:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

It is perhaps too late but I would endorse reconsideration of this request. The user in question is causing substantial disruption and needs to be dealt with very differently if he is making newbie mistakes, albeit in a persistent and varied fashion, versus deliberately trolling us. If his infractions do not warrant revelation of who the primary account, if any, is, it would be helpful to at least know whether other registered accounts are associated with this one. Newyorkbrad 19:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)