Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kmaguir1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Kmaguir1
- Kmaguir1 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Truthseekers (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Sonofhealfdane (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- MindMoves (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
On-going suspected sock puppet case: Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters feels that Kmaguir1 is a sockpuppet master of Truthseekers because Truthseekers solely made an edit to Michel Foucault to avoid 3RR detection in insertion of homophobic original research.[1] and [2]. I personally do not feel that they are sockpuppets because Kmaguir1 was only blocked for 12 hours on August 6, and Truthseekers edited Michel Foucault on August 11. Need confirmation before blocking, if possible. Iolakana|T 15:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I have just added Sonofhealfdane, who argues with Kmaguir1 in a good hand/bad hand sock style.--Anthony Krupp 13:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's alright, no need for further check. I have blocked that user. The account is only being used when necessary and to support the view of the other editors. Iolakana|T 13:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Truthseekers is not a sock, nor a meat. I have no idea what's up with Sonofhealfdane, and support a block, if that is what has been eventuated. Again, check the IP address--I have no way of knowing whether or not it's the same as I did in the first case, but I would imagine it's not (some frat houses share this IP, but they're unlikely to edit on wikipedia). You might also want to try looking at recent simple reverts on pages people are making because I delete one word that is POV and unnecessary, and now they're claiming, I always have to justify on a talk page before I make an edit, which of course, lunacy. We have made numerous contributions, and users like lulu (the foucault), csloat (the hooks), and krupp (the leibniz, of all things) are trolling MY user edits looking for systematic abuse, when there is none. I want a simple a fair edit of all the pages in question. -Kmaguir1 16:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- The Leibniz edit was fair. See Leibniz talk page and reply to the issues I raised there.--Anthony Krupp 16:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Truthseekers is not a sock, nor a meat. I have no idea what's up with Sonofhealfdane, and support a block, if that is what has been eventuated. Again, check the IP address--I have no way of knowing whether or not it's the same as I did in the first case, but I would imagine it's not (some frat houses share this IP, but they're unlikely to edit on wikipedia). You might also want to try looking at recent simple reverts on pages people are making because I delete one word that is POV and unnecessary, and now they're claiming, I always have to justify on a talk page before I make an edit, which of course, lunacy. We have made numerous contributions, and users like lulu (the foucault), csloat (the hooks), and krupp (the leibniz, of all things) are trolling MY user edits looking for systematic abuse, when there is none. I want a simple a fair edit of all the pages in question. -Kmaguir1 16:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Possible Mackensen (talk) 16:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
