Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kdkatpir2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kdkatpir2}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] Kdkatpir2

main edit links history watch
Filed: 20:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


  • Code letter: G

User:Kd lvr voted in favor of keeping the Ken Rice article during its AfD discussion, followed exactly one minute later by a "keep" vote from User:Kdkatpir2. See [1]. In addition, on two occasions ([2], ,[3]) the two have voted "keep" on an AfD on the Stacy Smith article in enough time where it is possible to post as one, sign out, sign in as the other user and post again.

I encountered these on a sanity check when a couple of other users suspected sockpuppetry. While ordinarily RFCUs shouldn't be filed while votes are underway, to my eyes this is so blatant as to warrant an exception. Blueboy96 20:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

  • This is the whole category of the suspected sockpuppets of User:Kdkatpir2 [4]. User(s) continue to troll talk pages and KDKA-TV. - SVRTVDude (VT) 20:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
    • User use same writing style on all accounts, and he has slipped one time, almost exposing his sock games. Vandalism and Page Ownership are also a problem, but his sockpuppetry is out of hand.

Kdkatpir2 and Kd lvr are Unrelated. No evidence offered regarding WTAEchick, and with no edits by that account, I see no reason to run a check: Declined. Dmcdevit·t 00:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.