Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Frater FiatLux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Frater FiatLux
main edit links history watch talk Filed: 22:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)) |
- Frater FiatLux (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Kephera975 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: G
This puppetmaster has been linked with User:Kephera975 and the other two listed socks. The accusations were raised by User:IPSOS in retaliation over several content disputes with User:Kephera975, and the blocking admin was specifically requested by IPSOS. The case seems muddled over whether Kephera975 is the sockpuppet or master, or Frater FiatLux. It is also unclear from the huge array of diffs whether Kephera975 specifically is a sockpuppet/master of these other accounts. A checkuser would help resolve this difficult to judge situation where large numbers of users were listed; where the accusation was brought by editors involved in a content dispute; and where the blocking admin was specifically recruited to take action by the user bringing the case - at present the objectivity of the case could be questioned. Comments on this case can be found here. ColdmachineTalk 22:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Frater FiatLux
main edit links history watch talk Filed: 05:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Frater FiatLux (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Brahman0 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Rondus (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- C00483033 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: F [1]
Frater FiatLux was blocked while engaged in page move vandalism while ranting about trademark rights. Socks were created very shortly after the block and, guess what, start ranting about trademark rights. Full details at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Frater FiatLux (2nd) IPSOS (talk) 05:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Declined. Mackensen (talk) 18:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.