Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fila3466757

[edit] Fila3466757

• Fila3466757 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Farlack907 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Farlack913 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Greenock125 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• ScotRail DBSO (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• ScotRail421 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• FA53764968566fgtu7757 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Rydo12345678 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: C
• Supporting evidence: See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fila3466757

There appears to be a long term pattern of falsifying information and serious incivility. The user appears to be switching accounts to avoid scrutiny and prevent being blocked. They seem to accumulate warnings and then hop to a new account. Jehochman ^Talk 22:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed ScotRail421 (talk · contribs) = Farlack913 (talk · contribs) = Fila3466757  (talk · contribs) = Filarules34555667894 (talk · contribs) = FilarulesFirstsucks (talk · contribs). Rydo, ScotRail DBSO and Farlack913 are Stale. The rest are Inconclusive.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed the above per Blnguyen (I'd also been working on this case, unawares). Also FA53764968566fgtu7757 (talk · contribs), Fila07 (talk · contribs) - Alison ^❤ 08:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I've indeffed the socks and blocked the Fila3466757 account for one week. The user was not blocked previously that I can tell, and they did make some useful contributions. If there is a recurrence, the block length should be much longer next time. I've also tagged the accounts. Jehochman ^Talk 14:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)