Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ED209
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] ED209
- ED209 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Sowpon (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Sowponn (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Jipanzee (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Logeon (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Scoties (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Mblitray (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- MiniRtiz (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/ED209 explains it, but in short, these users are all vandalism-only accounts, almost all of which were personal attacks (sometimes threats) directed at me. The editing style is very similar to that of User:ED209 (if a bit more extreme). These "users" have violated WP:NPA, WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL and just about every other policy dealing with inter-editor relations. Most of their edits are absolutely vile, I'd really appreciate a resolution to this craziness. Thanks. pm_shef 01:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Clerk note: Case consolidated with Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VaughanWatch and removed from RFCU listing. Depending on the outcome of the checks, this case will either be deleted, merged and redirected, or kept as a separate listing. Thatcher131 (talk) 16:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
