Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dragonslayer X

[edit] Dragonslayer X

• Dragonslayer X (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Adishankaracharya (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 125.22.63.36 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• Bruce7576 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: A, C

Consistent pattern of vandalism in the Brahman-Atman Yoga article. Please see the following examples as evidence 1, 2, 3 Armando Barrera 22:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Declined The Uninvited Co., Inc. 00:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

May I please know the reason why the request has been declined? Thank you! - Armando Barrera 15:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Uninvited Company has been contacted. anthonycfc ^[talk] 22:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Persistent pattern vandalism, in my mind, means dozens of accounts vandalizing hundreds of pages. Persistent pattern vandalism would be in most cases severe enough that it would be difficult to revert even using the automated tools that are now in widespread use. In most cases it would involve either a bot or an unusually savvy operator who understands how to make unusually disruptive edits. This isn't even close. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I said "consistent pattern of vandalism" not "persistent pattern vandalism." So, it doesn't really matter how you imagine or define "persistent pattern vandalism" because that is your own invented set of words, not mine. When I said "consistent pattern of vandalism" I simply mean that... users vandalizing an article in a pattern or way that seems consistent/resembling each other. May I please request a more responsible (i.e. less lazy) authority to kindly reconsider this matter. Thank you! - Armando Barrera 15:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)