Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ColScott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ColScott}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] ColScott

ThoughUnlessUntilWhether has already been established as a ColScott sock, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SqueakBox. I blocked TheOddler as an obvious sock. This request is to check for sleeper accounts and register new IPs. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed and Y Done. Thatcher 19:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


In looking over a series of contributions & edits involving sock puppets of User:ColScott, one of which was banned (User:FoolsRushIn), in relationship to edits conducted on Charles Manson, a suspicion has been raised about the identify of User:BassPlyr23 (talk|contributions). At best it's only a suspicion, however I noticed a similar comment left by FoolsRushIn on his own talk page where he opened with "Dude". Until I came across that, I wasn't very convinced. However Bassplyr23 left a comment on another editor's page starting out the same way. I know it's not a lot, but there is the same interest in the Manson page, using the same vernacular and the bordering on incivility I've seen in confirmed ColScott/puppet posts. Is there a way that you can check this and clarify whether it's the same person? If it is, then it will prevent a huge effort in working through issues regarding the Manson page. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

..and here I was just going to open a request for NomeKing as a likely ColScott sockpuppet; instead I will tack it on here. Editing style is consistent with ColScott, but I'd rather be sure.--Isotope23 talk 16:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Nevermind. Per this, NomeKing is most definitely ColScott. I'll leave the user up there for comparision with BassPlyr23.--Isotope23 talk 17:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated. ColScott is stale, as are many of his socks. A comparison of NomeKing (now confirmed as ColScott on behaviour only) and BassPlyr23 showed no similarities. If you have more ColScott socks I can check BassPlyr23 against, please provide their usernames here. --Deskana (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I'd say it's not worth bothering. I've had more than a few interactions with ColScott and personally I don't think BassPlyr23 shows any of the usual characteristics of ColScott editing.--Isotope23 talk 16:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ColScott

  • Code letter: F, possible ban evasion

Spawnopedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) recreated nearly word-for-word as Patty Columbo the article previously deleted as Patricia Columbo, created by the banned user ColScott (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log). Note that we have serious WP:BLP concerns about this article, which both ColScott and and Spawnopedia have dismissed for the same reason--that Ms. Columbo has been convicted of a crime. Chick Bowen 19:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Here is a relevant diff for the indefinite block of ColScott, more evidence is on his talk page: diff. GRBerry 19:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: Spawnopedia has now been blocked for 48 hours, with the concurrence of three administrators (none of them me) for trolling related to the article ColScott created. Chick Bowen 20:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I upped that to indef as this is an egregious WP:BLP violation. But please confirm, if you don't mind, to forestall further aggravation. Guy (Help!) 20:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.