Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Brya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Brya}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Brya

  • Code letter: F.

User:Brya was community banned[1] and has since created 4 sock puppets. The sock puppets are obvious, condescending to other editors about resolved issues,[2] italicizing higher taxa but not mentioning this in edit summary,[3],[4],[5] and inserting stilted prose about taxonomic nomenclature.[6] Can Brya's IP be blocked to prevent his/her further creation of sock puppets? We're still correcting Brya's original edits! KP Botany 19:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed. A fuller list, some already blocked:
  1. Brmstckstrivia (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  2. Clyb (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  3. Crambley (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  4. Doerpfel (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  5. Groosy (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  6. Hiplis (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  7. Kloppan (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  8. Lodzel (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  9. Ohawi (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  10. Ostol (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  11. Strigley (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  12. Urchol (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
  13. Wedster (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)

--jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I've found a couple of other User:Brya sock puppets, Brya's continued nastiness[7] to other editors and her continued failure to get what is wrong and how to be part of the community pretty much means that all of her sock puppets' edits will have to be verified independently, so these should be stopped also, until this verification of all of the sock puppet edits can be accomplished.

Thanks, KP Botany 20:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Looks like then we should also include:
  1. CannaCollector (talk contribs logs block user block log checkuser)
ReadersFavorite is stale. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 21:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't believe any of the Canna editors are Brya sockpuppets. MrDarwin 18:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.