Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Britlawyer

[edit] Britlawyer

• Britlawyer (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Buffadren (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Dikarka (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 193.120.95.11 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• William Mauco (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F

Could someone please check for the following:

• Are Britlawyer and Buffadren sockpuppets of Dikarka who is currently blocked for sockpuppetry and was strongly cautioned against evading the block.
• Are Britlawyer and Buffadren sockpuppets of each other.

Please check if one of them is from Ireland. We know that MarkStreet (talk · contribs) had socks like Henco (talk · contribs), Truli (talk · contribs), Esgert (talk · contribs). One of them has to be from Ireland.

Note: this is unrelated to the arbitration mentioned below; it's to do with a different article.Lyingoften 15:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Additional information needed — please provide a diff of the discussion that resulted in the ban or block ~ Anthony 18:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Declined. I've seen multiple RFCU's regarding Buffadren, and the result has been identical every time: there are no other users IP-related to Buffadren. Further, just yesterday, I ran a checkuser involving Buffadren and Britlawyer and Mauco, and they are on three different continents; there were no other users IP-related to Britlawyer either. If you think there's sockpuppetry happening, you'll have to demonstrate it some other way. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 19:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)