Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BigGabriel555

[edit] BigGabriel555

• BigGabriel555 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Ferreras555 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Luciano555 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter:C
• Supporting evidence: Personal Attacks [1], edit pattern of removing photos because he doesn't like the way they look [2], has been blocked twice for edit warring, and a new account with the same harsh edit pattern of removing photos which he doesnt care for. [3]

UnclePaco (talk) 06:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Luciano555 has been blocked since October 22, 2007 as a sock of BigGabriel555 -JodyB _talk 11:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: BigGabriel555 was blocked for one week for vandalizing on November 1, 2007, days after they were blocked for one day for 3 revert rule infringements (23 October 2007) -- Whiteandnerdy111 (talk) 19:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC).

Confirmed. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

As a confirmed sockpuppet why hasn't he been blocked? UnclePaco (talk) 04:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry in and of itself is not a blockable offense. It's when you get into sockpuppetry to avoid a block, to get around 3RR, or artificially build consensus that it becomes something you can get blocked for. As the sock has been identified beforehand, it hasn't been blocked but if the account is used abusively it will be.--Rosicrucian^Talk 13:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Rosicrucian i'm wondering why you appear to be following me around. Are you familiar with the WP:Stalk? I'm finding this a bit disturbing. UnclePaco (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

You cited this request for checkuser in reverting edits by Ferreras555 on Dominican Republic. If I appear to be following you around, it is because these are pages you have pointed out and linked myself and other users to in edit summaries and talkpages. As such, why do you consider me following links you point out to me to be disturbing?--Rosicrucian^Talk 14:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: what we have here is a pattern of disruptive editing and using socks to avoid detection. I'm blocking the sock that isn't already blocked indef and the master 1 week. Next time it'll be indef on the master. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:08, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

another one

• Gman555 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

UnclePaco (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed - and blocked - Alison ^❤ 21:36, 29 December 2007 (UTC)