Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anynobody

[edit] Anynobody

• Anynobody (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• ChrisO (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Anyeverybody (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• E:

Anynobody/Anyeverybody and ChrisO are both editing on the article L Ron Hubbard and support each other in a very similar way. Today "both" went into a revert war (with myself, stupid as I were), resulting in about 10 reverts total - dependent on how you define it - and further injection of POV material in the article or talk page by either of the two. After Anynobody was on 3RR, ChrisO jumped in and reverted on his behalf.

1. Revert/POV edit 2. Revert 3. Revert 4. Revert 5. Revert 6. POV push with false information

This situation has come up earlier (I will have to dig up the old diffs for that). Factually this editors are editing on Scientology articles pretty much exclusively L. Ron Hubbard, have similar writing styles and response times, aside from supporting each other on Hubbard articles.

Sure I might be wrong, but this is not the first time those two are strangely bonded. Please check. Shutterbug 08:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

I have no problem with this request. You are wrong, and it's funny you should observe us to be "bonded" since (last I checked) he left me hanging when trying to explain what WP:SYNTH is to you.

Please consider approving the request so that Shutterbug's concerns can be quelled. Anynobody 23:17, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Declined. Two people share the same point of view on things. That isn't enough evidence to perform a checkuser here. --Deskana (talk) 16:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)