Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Alkivar

[edit] Alkivar

• Alkivar (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Hidey Ho (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• BlueSapphires (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 86.137.24.224 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• 79.65.181.41 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• Code letter: G.

Shortly after opening a request for comment on User:Alkivar (a user with whom User:Abu badali had also had a dispute), User:Hidey Ho appeared and began making accusations of sockpuppetry against me and Abu badali on various user talk pages. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Endorse request. Hidey ho's first edit smells like it comes from a laundry pile. Timing is close enough to the RFC opening to raise eyebrows. Durova^Charge! 16:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Just FYI, there's an arb case about me going on, what means that I have a large "foe-club". I have no Idea who could have done that, but, intersecting my friends with Videmus's seems a good start. --Abu badali ^(talk) 17:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Adding BlueSapphires, who first edited on 29 July 2007, swiftly went to Alkivar's RFC, and knows a lot about Wikipedia process. Durova^Charge! 20:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

My first edit was in June, not July. I used to edit under another login. Someone guessed who I was. Privacy. BlueSapphires 15:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Added another IP from the RFC. First edit 26 July 2007. Knows a lot about process (fifth edit ever was to WP:AN).[1] Incivility.[2] Uncivil edit summary blanking warning.[3] Durova^Charge! 20:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, I doubt that Alkivar is a sockpuppeteer (though I guess CheckUser will find out); though I may disagree with him, he is a long-time admin. But when I saw Hidey-ho's and BlueSapphire's edits, I was reminded of this CheckUser request at an ArbCom talk page. I would request that a CheckUser investigate the relationship between those editors and the three suspected editors here. --Iamunknown 20:38, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Good observation. Durova^Charge! 21:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure this will blow your minds... but Endorse Request these accounts are not me, and I want factual evidence to back this up so they cannot be claimed as me.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 23:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Endorse Checkuser. Please disprove this one of Durova’s many false allegations made after I pointed out on the RFC that User talk:Videmus Omnia, who instigated the RFC had two ANI reports open. [1] [2] for multiple attacks on 4-5 users, including one expert newbie – I met Videmus Omnia from his expert-newbie attack, then discovered he had four attacks ongoing. As payback (for bringing this information to RFC) she accused me of being a sock on 3+ boards (here, RFC and AN; on AN she was begging for me to be POINT blocked for refuting her procative accusations on the RFC & AN which they did not do. Yesterday I was forced to notify other admins [1][2] [3] that I was making RFC strikeouts at the request of Videmus Omnia, to avoid more of her unfounded POINT accusations [1] [2] from her on AN. I’ve told her 3-4 times that I changed names as my old history was linked to my real name, but she continues the attacks on RFC/Alkivar 1 2 3 and if I respond, she’ll request me blocked for POINT. What to do? WP:DISAGREED WITH DUROVA is not an actionable offence. I refer everyone to what Swatjester replied to Durova's accusations of me:

While I agree with both of you, it doesn't stop the evidence from being correct. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 22:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Well said by Swatjester. BlueSapphires 10:10, 30 July 2007

I honestly don't believe anymore that Alikivar is involved either - I'm actually pretty sure now that they're all BlueSapphires-related. Sorry, Alkivar. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:19, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Videmus Omnia you owe me an apology for that, and I'll be waiting for it on my talk board.BlueSapphires 10:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Unlikely that they are related. 86.137.24.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) is Veesicle (talk · contribs) avoiding his block and sockpuppeting as he promised to do. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:45, 30 July 2007 (UTC)