Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/68.54.56.198

[edit] 68.54.56.198

• 68.54.56.198 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 71.3.217.217 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• HavenBastion (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Code letter: F

Okay, I've got pretty strong evidence here. Both sockpuppets act like the owner of a link in question (which we know is true with the sockpuppeteer; they go by the handle of Advocate diff and have an e-mail address at the link in question diff), and they use the EXACT SAME argument when it comes to keeping the link. As this one has to be concise, a detailed argument is at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/68.54.56.198. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 12:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

It seems that there are meatpuppets floating around at First-person shooter; whether these are or not remains to be seen. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 14:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, both 68.54.56.198 (on Talk:First-person shooter) and HavenBastion on (User talk:HavenBastion) claim to own the website in question (i.e. they both call it "my site"). I think that's pretty solid evidence, especially since neither has bothered to read WP:EL and WP:COI; they both use the same argument that their website is a good resource. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 13:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: case listed, but if I may, if you're convinced by editing patterns that the IP and the user are the same person already, what are you expecting from this RFCU? -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Just in case they decide to take up the "it wasn't me!" defence, a successful RFCU will trump them and remove any uncertainty and doubt. They've got a history of being ignorant and dishonest, so they'll likely dispute the results of a SSP case alone. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 16:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Declined. CheckUser unnecessary; user is blocked already. Dmcdevit·t 23:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)