Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/WikiUser/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority aye vote will be enacted.
  • Items that receive a majority nay vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority aye or nay vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.

On this case, 3 arbitrators are recused and 1 is inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on.

Contents

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page.

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net aye votes needed to pass (each nay vote subtracts an aye)
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:


[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] No personal attacks

1) No personal attacks.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:35, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:15, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Courtesy

2) Wikipedia users are required to be courteous in their dealings with other users.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:42, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:15, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Vandalism

3) Vandalism of Wikipedia will not be tolerated.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:52, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:15, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Edit warring / three-revert rule

4) Users are expected to avoid edit wars and to respect the three-revert rule.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:13, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Legal threats

5) No legal threats.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:33, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:29, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Editing Wikipedia during a legal dispute

5.5) It is best for both Wikipedia and its users that those who are in a legal dispute with it or its users discontinue editing until all legal disputes which they have initiated have been resolved.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 03:51, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:29, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Sockpuppetry

6) The use of sockpuppet accounts, while not generally forbidden, is discouraged. Abuse of sockpuppet accounts, such as using them to evade blocks and bans, make personal attacks or reverts, or vandalize, is strictly forbidden.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:53, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 16:31, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Reasonableness

7) Wikipedia users are required to maintain a reasonable attitude with respect to editing and relationships with other users.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:53, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
  1. Too vague - what does "reasonable attitude" mean? I like the idea, but the wording needs to be betterTheresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:15, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
It means the sort of behavior exemplified by the examples cited at the finding of fact with respect to unreasonableness Fred Bauder 13:09, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  1. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) see 7.1
  2. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Prefer 7.1.)
  3. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 7.1
Abstain:


[edit] Reasonableness and disruption

7.1) Wikipedia users are expected to behave reasonably with respect to editing and relating to other users. Editing practices that cause disruption to the normal functioning of Wikipedia will not be tolerated.


Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 13:09, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. sannse (talk) 20:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) expanded, as discussed with Fred
  3. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Taking "reasonable" to be an informal summary of a whole host of established policies, including "assume good faith", "don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point", "avoid edit wars", etc.)
  4. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 09:49, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Ambi 04:32, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Editing from an anonymous ip

1) User:WikiUser has frequently edited from the ip 217.204.65.210, see [1] and [2]

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:33, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:36, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Personal attacks

2) Editing from the ip 217.204.65.210 and as User:WikiUser WikiUser has made personal attacks: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], "nazi raul654", [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and [14]

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:33, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:36, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Discourtesy

3. Editing from the ip 217.204.65.210 and under User:WikiUser WikiUser has been discourteous in his dealings with other users: [15], [16] and [17]

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:44, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:38, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Vandalism

4) Editing from the ip 217.204.65.210 User:WikiUser vandalized Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and pages on Simple English.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:50, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) (but note that we have no jurisdiction over simple.)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Noting the simple: vandalism merely as additional evidence of a pattern of disruptive behavior.)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 09:51, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Three revert rule

5) Alternating as User:Wikiuser and the anonymous ip 217.204.65.210 WikiUser created the article Secondary modern school [18]. When another editor edited it he reverted at 11:35, Jan 22, 2005, again at 12:07, Jan 25, 2005, again at 14:49, Jan 25, 2005, again at 15:12, Jan 25, 2005 and again at 15:54, Jan 25, 2005.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:28, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) (a minor issue in this case though)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (But a single 3-rr violation is fairly minor and an issue for a 24-hr block by a sysop rather than arbitration.)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Legal threats

6) Editing from the ip 217.204.65.210 on User talk:WikiUser User:WikiUser made legal threats.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:39, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:37, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Unreasonableness

7) User:WikiUser has on a number of occasions taken an unreasonable attitude with respect both to editing and with respect to the actions of other users: [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34] and [35]

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 03:02, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 20:47, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 09:52, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Ban for personal attacks

1) User:WikiUser is banned for one year for personal attacks.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:36, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 21:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:


[edit] Ban for discourtesy

2) User:WikiUser is banned for one year for discourtesy.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:45, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
  1. if discourtesy were a bannable offense, some highly-valued admins would be gone ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  2. sannse (talk) 21:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) prefer this as part of a more holistic ruling as below (5.1)
  3. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Not bannable per se IMO.)
  4. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Abstain:

[edit] Ban for vandalism

3) User:WikiUser is banned for one year for vandalism.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 01:53, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 02:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

:# Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

  1. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Nay:
  1. sannse (talk) 21:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) this part of the pattern of problem behaviour that makes a ban necessary, but not enough for a year ban in itself (especially as we have no jurisdiction over simple.) See combined ruling below (5.1)
  2. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Not the main issue in this case.)
  3. Sannse has convinced me. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 18:39, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) Not to an extent rating a year. This isn't at the core of the problems with WikiUser.
Abstain:

[edit] Ban for legal threats

4) User:WikiUser is banned for making legal threats.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 02:41, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:30, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    sannse (talk) 21:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) I suggest alternative wording to show the intent of this more clearly: "WikiUser is required to discontinue editing until all legal disputes he has initiated have been resolved." - or possibly I have misunderstood the intent?
    Please see enforcement which limits the ban to one year after resolution of all legal disputes.
    Then Nay - I believe strongly that we should not enact punitive bans for legal threats. They should be solely a protective withdrawal until all threats are withdrawn, expired or action completed. sannse (talk)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. sannse (talk) 23:11, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) changed vote - only valid in connection with Enforcement 2.3
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
  1. sannse (talk) 10:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) see above
Abstain:

4.1) WikiUser is required to discontinue editing until all legal disputes he has initiated have been resolved.

Aye:
  1. sannse (talk) 10:09, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) now covered an Aye for remedy 4, plus the change at enforcement 2.3
  2. Fred Bauder 16:55, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (in addition to a ban)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Ban for unreasonableness

5) User:WikiUser is banned for unreasonable behavior.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 03:05, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
  1. "unreasonable behavior" is not bannable — must be more specific to get my vote ➥the Epopt 23:11, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  2. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Prefer 5.1.)
  3. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) 5.1
Abstain:
  1. I like where I think this is going, but I'm not sure that this is the way to put it. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  2. Perhaps disruptive behaviour is a better way to put it? Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:32, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 21:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) see (5.1)

5.1) For behaviour causing significant disruption to the normal functioning of Wikipedia, including repeated personal attacks, discourtesy, vandalism, edit warring, and other unreasonable behaviour. WikiUser is banned for one year.

Aye:
  1. sannse (talk) 21:41, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  2. Fred Bauder 22:29, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 23:11, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 18:37, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. Ambi 04:40, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Bans to run concurrently

1) All bans of definite duration shall run concurrently.

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 03:44, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 08:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. sannse (talk) 21:42, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) Particularly as he's already run up a year ...
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Enforcement of bans for legal threats and unreasonableness

2) The bans for legal threats and unreasonableness are of indefinite duration and shall expire in the case of legal threats one year after resolution of all claims made by User:WikiUser against Wikipedia or any of its users and with respect to the ban for unreasonableness after successful editing of Wikipedia for a period of one month following the expiration of all other bans (in other words after the expiration of all bans of definite duration WikiUser may return to editing but shall be on probation for six months and may again be banned should he again begin to behave in an unreasonable way).

Aye:
  1. Fred Bauder 03:14, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
  1. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Prefer versions below.)
  2. ➥the Epopt 05:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Abstain:
  1. The wording is a bit convoluted, and one month is too short. Ambi 04:33, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  2. I've seperated the points and simplified them ( I hope) below. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 09:13, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. sannse (talk) 21:42, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)


2.1) The ban for legal threats will expire one year after resolution of all legal claims made by WikiUser against Wikipedia or any of its users.

Aye:
  1. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 09:12, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC) persuaded
  2. Fred Bauder 13:02, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
    sannse (talk) 21:42, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) I misread, struck for further consideration
  3. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC) (Although if the resolution is in an amicable manner and circumstances look different than anticipated, WikiUser may of course appeal to have the ban dropped or shortened.)
    Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) for consistency, I'm canceling this vote in favor of 2.3, which now has 5 votes


Nay:
  1. sannse (talk) 10:13, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) - This should be on resolution, not one year after. If no specific withdrawl of threats is made then we presume resolution after a year, but if threats are withdrawn that should be the end of it (other bans would still apply of course) - alternative below see 2.3
  2. ➥the Epopt 05:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Abstain:

2.2) The ban for legal threats will expire on resolution of all legal disputes. If one year passes with no further threats and no action taken it will be assumed that all disputes have been resolved. Further legal threats will reset the ban.

Aye:
  1. sannse (talk) 10:13, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) (only if 2.3 doesn't pass)
  2. Fred Bauder 19:39, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 05:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
  1. Fred Bauder 16:57, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
Abstain:

2.3) After one year with no further legal threats and no action taken it will be assumed that all disputes have been resolved and the ban for legal threats will be lifted. Further legal threats will reset the ban, and the ban will remain in place during and after any formal action taken. If other bans are not active and the matter is resolved prior to the lifting of this ban, Wikiuser can apply to the committee for a change to these conditions.

Aye:
  1. sannse (talk) 23:11, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC) I think this one helps with both mine and Freds concerns. A year, unless further threats/action are taken... instead of a year after threats are withdrawn (or two years if the are not withdrawn) as suggested in 2.1
  2. Fred Bauder 23:59, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  3. ➥the Epopt 05:44, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Ambi 04:40, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. Nohat 05:01, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) Looks workable.
  7. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 16:34, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Probation on return

3) WikiUser will be on a 6 month probation if he returns after the ban period has expired. If he behaves disruptively or unreasonably during that time he may be blocked for a period of up to one week.

Aye:
  1. Theresa Knott (The snott rake) 09:12, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  2. ➥the Epopt 12:34, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Fred Bauder 13:02, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
  4. sannse (talk) 21:42, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  5. Delirium 02:20, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nohat 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  7. Ambi 04:40, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  8. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

Four net Aye votes needed to close case (each Nay vote subtracts an Aye)
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

  1. David Gerard 14:51, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) everything that should pass has; enforcement 2.3 could do with more, but has passed anyway
  2. ➥the Epopt 15:05, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ambi 15:07, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  4. Fred Bauder 16:23, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Theresa Knott (ask the rotten) 16:36, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  6. sannse (talk) 22:11, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)