Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RK/Evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please choose an appropriate header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Please do this under a separate header, to seperate your response from the original evidence.

Be aware that the arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent.

Contents

[edit] Other relevant pages

mostly pinched from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RK

  1. Wikipedia:Community case RK (older version)
  2. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RK, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RK2
  3. m:RK
  4. User talk:RK/Departure
  5. User:MyRedDice/Wikipedians attacked by RK

Just for background. —No-One Jones 04:16, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Abusive edit summaries

These speak for themselves, I think. All may be verified through Special:Contributions/RK. More are available if needed. —No-One Jones 01:33, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Garden-variety abuse

  1. 02:45, 3 Sep 2004 Talk:Anti-Defamation League (Cadr is clearly pushing grossly anti-Semitic views.)
  2. 02:43, 3 Sep 2004 Anti-Defamation League (ADL hater on the loose?)
  3. 02:41, 3 Sep 2004 Talk:Anti-Defamation League (Revert anti-Semitic edits by Cadr. He has gove over-the-edge by saying that the word "anti-Semitic" is inherently POV.)
  4. 21:39, 31 Aug 2004 Talk:Jew (Removing anti-Semitic Nazi attacks by an admitted anti-Semite. These people are out of control.)
  5. 21:38, 31 Aug 2004 Artscroll (ezra, stop deleting all material that you don't personally approve of. Your pseudo-Orthodox censorship is a violation of Wikipedia standards.)
  6. 21:24, 31 Aug 2004 Judaism (Our encyclopedia is not the place for Ezra Wax's off-topic quasi-Orthodox religious sermons.)
  7. 14:54, 11 Aug 2004 Minyan (Reverting censorship meant to push ultra-Orthodox views.)
  8. 14:13, 11 Aug 2004 Anti-Defamation League (Removing blatant, old-fashioned Jew-baiting, using Ariel Sharon's quote as a reason to make an attack on all Jews. For shame.)
  9. 14:10, 11 Aug 2004 Role of women in Judaism (Jayjg, your misrepresentation and censorship will not be tolerated,)
  10. 14:01, 11 Aug 2004 The Passion of the Christ (Revert deliberate lies by Jayjg. Sysops, please be cautious of people lying about the Jewish community.)
  11. 16:27, 5 Aug 2004 Relationship between segments of Judaism (Revert due to vandalism. Jayjg is inserting deliberate lies about both Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews in order to slander them. This issue is now up for Sysop action.)
  12. 16:24, 5 Aug 2004 Relationship between segments of Judaism (Jayjg, I cannot let you replace facts with ultra-Orthodox paranoid and propaganda.)
  13. 00:01, 4 Aug 2004 Relationship between segments of Judaism (VANDALISM ALERT. Jayjg is writing totally false hatespeech about Reform Jews. He also is making accusations about edits which no one is even making. Hatred of non-Orthodox Jews does not justify fraud)
  14. 23:55, 3 Aug 2004 Talk:Relationship between segments of Judaism (Lengthy quotes, balance - Response to Jayjg, who is printing hatespeech about non-Orthodox Jews, and is lying about words that I simply never wrote.)
  15. 23:43, 3 Aug 2004 Relationship between segments of Judaism (Jayjg, stop forging quotes from Reform Jews at once. Your attempts to fraudulent positions border on vandalism. Cut it out.)
  16. 14:04, 3 Aug 2004 Relationship between segments of Judaism (Reform views - Jayjyg, stop your hateful liesa bout Reform Jews. How dare you try to incite hatred against Jews. We will have to remove your false claims/)
  17. 13:13, 30 Jul 2004 Philosophy (Sysops, please help. Simonides is still reverting every single edit to this article. He is totaslly out of control. See Talk section.)
  18. 21:37, 27 Jul 2004 Philosophy (Please stop adding little digs at people you consider to be "in the West". Your obesession on this is not healthy.)
  19. 17:21, 27 Jul 2004 Islamophobia (See discussion. John Ball is reverting all content not written by him, and pursing an anti-Jewish bias to push his political beliefs.)
  20. 01:02, 27 Jul 2004 Judaism (Ezra, quit jerking us around. Stop labeling this article as being from a "liberal viewpoint". learn the difference between Orthodoxy and NPOV.)
  21. 20:08, 22 Jul 2004 Islamism (Graft, your censorship will have to be reported. Sysops, note that Graft refuses to allow any POV other than his own to exist here. This is trolling.)
  22. 15:58, 20 Jul 2004 Islamophobia (Sysops, the Wiki-En list has been notified of John Ball's non-stop reverts, and his preventing of any new edits to this article.)
  23. 15:38, 20 Jul 2004 Islamophobia (John Ball, your actions have been reported to the Wiki-En list. Stop pushing your pro-Islamic beliefs, and slandering others Muslims as racist. That is intolerable.)
  24. 15:07, 20 Jul 2004 Bible conspiracy theories (Zero000 is stll mass reverting all info from this article. He has a long history of doing this to many articles.)
  25. 04:35, 18 Jul 2004 Talk:Zionism (Please ignore Bk0's anti-Semitic Bible conspiracy theories.)
  26. 04:33, 18 Jul 2004 Bible conspiracy theories (Mustafa and Zero are reverting this page to hide views they consider unpleasant. Such censorship is forbidden, and will be reverted.)
  27. 04:19, 18 Jul 2004 Talk:Israel Shahak (Sysops, please stop Zero's ad homenim personal attacks and anti-Semitic Jew bashing.)
  28. 03:01, 18 Jul 2004 Talk:Israel Shahak (Responding to Dan's anti-Semitic canards)
  29. 22:39, 17 Jul 2004 Talk:Israel Shahak (More abuse and Wikipedia norms violations by "Zero".)
  30. 04:18, 15 Jul 2004 Philosophy (SYSOP ALERT. Simonides is out of control on all articles. He reverts all edits by most people as vandalism, and is slandering other contributors.)
  31. 22:20, 14 Jul 2004 Talk:Israel Shahak (Zero's personal attacks do not justify his vandalism. Where do we hgo from here? Why not try Wikipedia NPOV policy for a change? Stop the censorship.)
  32. 20:25, 13 Jul 2004 Talk:Israel Shahak (Response to vandalism by Zero.)
  33. 20:12, 13 Jul 2004 Talk:Anti-Semitism (Simonides is abusive and out of control.)
  34. 19:43, 13 Jul 2004 Anti-Semitism (Sysops, please stop Simonides from perverting this article to push his views. He keeps recerting everyone else's work.)
  35. 19:42, 13 Jul 2004 Anti-Semitism (VANDALISM ALERT. Simonides is out of control. He keeps deleting other people's text, and inserting Muslim and Christian apologetics.)
  36. 19:36, 13 Jul 2004 Anti-Semitism (Stop reverting everyone else's work. Stop inserting Christian and Muslim religious apologetics. You may be taken to arbitration if your vandalism persists.)
  37. 14:40, 13 Jul 2004 Israel Shahak (Zero, this is verging on vandalism. Please stop deleting huge chunks of this article, especially about the topic for which this man is most well known.)
  38. 13:01, 13 Jul 2004 Israel Shahak (Please stop deleting large portions of this article. This controversy is one of the major reasons that this person is known! Your repeated deletions are censorship.)
  39. 12:03, 13 Jul 2004 Anti-Semitism (Simonides, you are out of control. Stop referring to all edits as vandalism. This is NOT a page about Islam, nor a page about promoting Christianity. Cut it out.
  40. 13:31, 12 Jul 2004 Talk:Anti-Zionism (More strawman attacks on Jews. This is turning into classic Jew-baiting. Stop this.)
  41. 14:44, 4 Jul 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Stop your non-stop reverts. As Jimbo Wales affirmed, you are violating NPOV and pushing censorship. Stop your use of Wikipedia to push pro-Arab propaganda. For shame.)
  42. 14:26, 4 Jul 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (STOP REVERTING THIS ARTICLE. Stop cutting out huge amounts of facts to push pro-Arab views. Your censorship is a POV violation.)
  43. 00:58, 3 Jul 2004 Talk:Anti-Semitism (Why is this article still protected? The only problem is Simonides and his anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.)
  44. 00:58, 24 Jun 2004 Talk:Anti-Semitism (About the clearly anti-Semitic vandalism by Simonides.)
  45. 00:54, 24 Jun 2004 Anti-Semitism (Sysops, an anti-semite has started a revert edit war, and keeps deleting sources which back up claims in this article.)
  46. 00:50, 24 Jun 2004 Anti-Semitism (Adding more sources. Simonides, stop your thinly veiled anti-Semitism. Your anti-Jewish agenda on Wikipedia is a violation of our NPOV policy. Also, stop deleting sources.)
  47. 23:31, 22 Jun 2004 Mahmoud Abbas (Sero, stop reverting facts that disagree with your pro-Arafat politics. For shame.)
  48. 22:24, 13 Jun 2004 Traditional Chinese medicine (Jiang, please stop your reversions. You need to control yourself, and stop pushing your religious beliefs as scientific facts.)
  49. 15:15, 20 Apr 2004 Alternative medicine (Sysops, please control Mr Natural Health. He is doing non-stop reversions.)
  50. 15:45, 12 Apr 2004 Talk:Palestinian views of the peace process (Refuting bald-faced lies and personal attacks. Sysops, PLEASE stop the pro-Arab Israel bashing and personal attacks)
  51. 15:22, 12 Apr 2004 Talk:Palestinian views of the peace process (Sysops, please see Jimbo Wale's comments. Martin Harper is censoring and vandalising this article. Stop his out of control attacks, please.)
  52. 15:19, 12 Apr 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Sysops, please see Jimbo Wale's comments. Martin Harper is censoring and vandalising this article. Stop his out of control attacks,)
  53. 15:10, 12 Apr 2004 Talk:Alternative medicine/Archive 8 (Chicago, PLEASE check the Wiki-En list., MNH claims to be a Nazi, and has a history of making threats. Don't fall for his shtick. This is no joke.)
  54. 14:51, 12 Apr 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (VANDALISM ALERT. Martin has been warned about his one man campaign of censorship. The Wiki-En list has been notified of his harassment)
  55. 14:36, 12 Apr 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (VANDALISM ALERT. Martin has been warned about his one man campaign of censorship. Please speak to him about his non-stop vandalism and hatred of Israel.)
  56. 15:00, 11 Apr 2004 Alternative medicine (MNH just doesn't get it. Sysops, please refer MNH again to the strictures against him from the Wiki-En list. Wow! Is he really this dense?)
  57. 14:22, 11 Apr 2004 Alternative medicine (MNH just doesn't get it. His non-stop vandalism will not be allowed. Sysops, please refer him again to the strictures from the Wiki-En list.)
  58. 15:48, 9 Apr 2004 Traditional Chinese medicine (Sysops, please talk o Heidimo, He keeps pushing his religious views and censoring valid scientific views. He is really out of control.)
  59. 02:06, 9 Apr 2004 Traditional Chinese medicine (Stop false accusations of vandalism, and stop pushing your Chinese religious beliefs. Your violation of Wikipedia policy is troubling.)
  60. 18:11, 27 Mar 2004 Talk:Palestinian views of the peace process (Please help stop Martin's anti-Israeli vandalism. He has no right to unilaterally censor information to push his Arab cause.)
  61. 18:06, 27 Mar 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (VANDALISM ALERT. Martin has been warned about his one man campaign of censorship. Please speak to him about his balnking of this article.)
  62. 21:08, 3 Feb 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Reverting vandalism by Viajero and Martin Harper. The Wiki-En has been notified of this repeated vandalism, and of Martin's refusal to mediate.)
  63. 14:50, 31 Jan 2004 User:MyRedDice/Wikipedians attacked by RK (Removing violation of Wiki-etiquette, and clear harassment. Martin is againt out of control. Sysops, please delete this hatepage.)
  64. 14:47, 25 Jan 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Reverting vandalism by Martin Harper (MyRedDice) As discussed on the Wiki-En list, this mass deletion for political purposes #is# vandalism and censorship, and will not be accepted.)
  65. 14:02, 25 Jan 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Removing vast amount of censorship by Martin Harper. (Advocated of anti-Semitic postings should not be censoring this article.))
  66. 22:31, 11 Jan 2004 Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Again, please stop left-wing censorship. Allow readers to make up their own minds. Your actions have been reported to the Wiki-En list.)
  67. 22:04, 11 Jan 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Viajero, please do not be dishonest about the consensus. See the Wiki-En list. Your removal of quotes has already been condemned as unfair censorship. Please stop trolling.)
  68. 14:17, 11 Jan 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Reverting censorship based on hatred of Israel. Action on the Wiki-En list has been taken. Censoring user has a long history of personal attacks.)
  69. 14:15, 11 Jan 2004 Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Reverting anti-Israeli, left-wing censorship and POV violations. Martin, your actions have been reported.)
  70. 13:49, 11 Jan 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Reverting censorship based on hatred of Israel. Action on the Wiki-En list has been taken. Censoring user has a long history of personal attacks.)
  71. 13:34, 11 Jan 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Removing gross censorship, and bald-faced lies. (No copyright violations occured. Martin is just doing a Danny, and deleting quotes he wants to censor.))
  72. 01:12, 11 Jan 2004 User talk:RK (fuck you sick Nazi bastards - repeated insults from Martine deleted. Martins' behavior is spiraling out of control. Response to Adam Carr's attack on me.)
  73. 02:07, 9 Jan 2004 Israeli-Palestinian conflict (VANDALISM ALERT. This is no joke. Danny is hysterically out of control. And allowing Palestinians to speak for themselves is not "right-wing bias". That is hysterical, if not insane.)
  74. 02:00, 9 Jan 2004 Talk:Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Sysops, please help, Danny and Zero are repeatedly vandalizing this article. This is gross censorship and vandalism. They are totally out of control.)
  75. 15:18, 2 Jan 2004 History of anti-Semitism (Um, some out and out Jew-haters are calling us "Jewish supremacists" in the comment lines. We shouldn't allow edits on this article from anti-Semites.)
  76. 13:52, 31 Dec 2003 Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Reverting gross vandalism by Zero0000. This is not a joke. This is a deliberate attempt at vandalism.)
  77. 14:25, 21 Dec 2003 Israel Shahak (Removing gross censorship by Zero. Zero, stop pushing your anti-Zionist bias. These are #major# points that you are trying to hide. For shame.)
  78. 19:37, 20 Dec 2003 Israel Shahak (Removing critical material shamelessly censored by Zero. His hugest controversies are important points to mention, and not embarassments to hide. For shame.)
  79. 15:47, 6 Dec 2003 Peter Singer (Danny, please stop vandalising this article by writing provably false statements. That is a violation of NPOV and Wikipedia policy. Please calm down.)
  80. 15:46, 6 Dec 2003 Talk:Peter Singer (Danny, stop vandalising this article by deleting other people's comments. This is a serious violation of Wikipedia etiquette.)
  81. 15:28, 6 Dec 2003 Peter Singer (Danny, get control over youself. We are talking about fucking animals and murdering babies and old people. Are your edits a joke, or are you serious...?)
  82. 13:37, 6 Dec 2003 Talk:Alternative medicine/Archive 8 (Removing personal attcks from Mr-Natural-Health, who is close to being a vandal. He is pushing his own views for financial gain/)
  83. 02:47, 25 Nov 2003 Talk:Zionism (It has nothing to do with intelligence. Zero0000 has committed libel by fabricating beliefs I do not have, and making me out to be a bigot.)
  84. 02:27, 25 Nov 2003 Talk:Zionism (Zeroooo, please stop slanderous lies. Control your rage. I will alert Sysops to your violation of Wikipedia protocol and libel.)
  85. 01:32, 4 Nov 2003 Talk:Gaia philosophy (Responding to trolling and personal attacks by Cimon.)
  86. 01:25, 4 Nov 2003 Gaia philosophy (Cimon, please stop your mass reversions, your lies about my own statements, and stop attacking things I have never said. You need to get some sort of control over your anger.)
  87. 15:30, 2 Nov 2003 Islam (PLEASE! Stop your mass deletions, your mass reversions, and your edit war. Your behaviour is totally unacceptable, and a total violation of Wikipedia policy.)
  88. 03:23, 27 Oct 2003 Anti-Semitism (Reverting Danny's one person edit war. Please see Talk page. Danny is out of control, and has gutted nearly the entire article.)
  89. 03:21, 27 Oct 2003 User talk:Danny (Danny, you are now overly emotional. Please stop unilaterally gutting this anti-Semitism article)
  90. 03:09, 27 Oct 2003 Anti-Semitism (Reverting vandalism by Danny. Sysops, please see Talk page. Danny is gutting this entire essay to push his own POV. He is emotional, and becoming out of control.)
  91. 03:00, 27 Oct 2003 Talk:Anti-Semitism (Please stop hysterically deletin material.)
  92. 02:53, 27 Oct 2003 Anti-Semitism (Danny, your personal crusade to delete everything you personally disagree with is now out of control. Stop this destructive behaviour. Do not claim ownership.)
  93. 02:35, 21 Oct 2003 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Adam / Lir is on a censorship rampage, riding roughshod over group consensus. She/he is back to his/her old harassment.)
  94. 02:25, 21 Oct 2003 Talk:People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Adam, aka Lir, aka Pizza Puzzle, is again censoring opinions that he disagrees with, and is making edits at the rate of one a minute.)
  95. 14:32, 10 Oct 2003 User talk:RK (Toby Bartels is a bald faced liar. That's just pathetic,)
  96. 23:54, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (While you are harassing me and slandering Catholics and Jews, this page will be blanked. What is so hard to understand about this?)
  97. 23:43, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (While censorship, Jew-baiting and Catholic bashing is being practiced, this page WILL be blanked.)
  98. 23:42, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (Removing Stevertigo's offtopic rants about the USA and the State of Israel. His hatred of Israel has nothing to do with Christian-Jewish relations)
  99. 23:41, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (Removing anti-Catholic polemics. This is not Usenet. Peddle your hatred elsewhere.)
  100. 23:37, 1 Oct 2003 User talk:RK (REMOVING HARASSMENT FROM MARTIN)
  101. 21:31, 1 Oct 2003 User talk:RK (Martin, stop vandalizing my home page. Your behaviour has been reported.)
  102. 21:22, 1 Oct 2003 User talk:RK (reverting vandalism by Martin. Stop the Jew-baiting. Your actions have been reported.)
  103. 16:41, 1 Oct 2003 User talk:RK (Stop writing on my page, Stevertigo and Martin. Your anti-Semitic harassment has been noted, and sent to the WikiEn list. )
  104. 16:17, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (WARNING. Anti-Semitic racists have vandalized this page and protected it.)
  105. 14:35, 1 Oct 2003 Christian-Jewish reconciliation (Removing bald-faced anti-Semitic lie. Guys, these attacks on Jews are NOT funny.)
  106. 14:25, 1 Oct 2003 Christian-Jewish reconciliation (Removing Stevertigo's rant about the US, Israel, oil and Arabs. Off topic POV pushing to attack israel is not appropriate. Removing fake statements about Catholic Vatican II.)
  107. 13:59, 1 Oct 2003 Israeli-Palestinian conflict (reverting gross falsehood by Zero0000. His "facts" are a total fiction, that he has made up. This is shameful and dishonest behaviour.)
  108. 13:55, 1 Oct 2003 Christian-Jewish reconciliation (Sysop alert. Stevertigo and Martin and newuser are adding anti-Semitic rants, with no basis in facts, solely to attack Jews. )
  109. 01:09, 1 Oct 2003 Christian-Jewish reconciliation (VANDALISM ALERT. New user is pushing anti-Catholic bigotry. Please help control him.)
  110. 00:24, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation ( Please stop your anti-Semitic Jew-bating. I really have enough of your hatred and contempt towards Jews.)
  111. 00:20, 1 Oct 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (VANDALISM ALERT. Martin (MyRedDice) is editing out comments he doesn't like. He also is encouraging anti-Catholic bashing and anti-Semitic slander.)
  112. 00:09, 1 Oct 2003 User talk:RK (Stevertigo, stop your outrageous anti-Semitic slander.)
  113. 20:51, 30 Sep 2003 Talk:Christian-Jewish reconciliation (Responding to anti-Semitic distribe and anti-Catholic pompous arrogance.)
  114. 16:04, 26 Sep 2003 Edward Said (Restoring text censored by pro-Artab participants. Whitewashing this man's statements and actions is a gross act of censorship.)
  115. 14:02, 26 Sep 2003 Mel Gibson (Reverting gross censorship, based on paritipants personal hatred of me. Do not censor Mel Gibson's own beliefs to suit your own political agenda.)
  116. 14:02, 26 Sep 2003 Talk:Mel Gibson (I will revert shameful censorship by bigots who are hiding Mel; Gibson's beliefs and statements. Censorship is not a part of Wikipedia policy. Removing off-topic personal slander.)
  117. 23:22, 25 Sep 2003 Mel Gibson (Reverting vandalism by a clearly anti-Semitic user. He claims that it is "racist" to describe Mel Gibson's beliefs, and the beliefs of his father. )
  118. 20:49, 18 Sep 2003 Modern Islamic philosophy (Removing anti-American and anti-Jewish diatribes by our anonymous idiot, who is trying to push his POV on all Islam related articles. For shame.)
  119. 17:21, 29 Aug 2003 Talk:Ethics (Refuting bald-faced lies, and apparent genuine paranoid, by an out of control person who just can't speak English well.)
  120. 15:37, 26 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Deleting outrageous libel and harssment. WikiEn list has been informed of harassment by Martin and Entmoots Of Trools. DO NOT restore this page.)
  121. 01:09, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia talk:Community case RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified.)
  122. 01:09, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified.)
  123. 01:00, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia talk:Community case RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. (Amazing how stupid some people are. They don't notice the pattern...))
  124. 00:26, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Removing sick and hateful comments by some rather sick, disturbed people. Sysops, I am requesting an official vandalism alert.)
  125. 00:11, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Seriously, I truly believe that we are dealing with mentally ill people. Stop this sick, sick harassment and hatespeech. You really do need to see a therapist.)
  126. 23:59, 23 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Six pages about banning are not enough? Fuck off, you sicko.)
  127. 23:50, 23 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (The fact that there are now six pages about banning me is a clear sign of very sick, violent hatred. EoT, Martin, everyone else..see a fucking therapist. There is something seriously wrong with you.)
  128. 19:11, 21 Aug 2003 Talk:Creationism/Archive 6 (Response to Netesq's baldfaced fabrications, and fundamentalist deceptive math tricks. LOL!)
  129. 16:49, 21 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (VANDALISM ALERT: EntmootsOfTrolls is deliberately setting up circular links as a form of harassment. He has done this multiple times. Please stop this deliberate harassment.)
  130. 19:14, 20 Aug 2003 User talk:RK (Removing paranoid ranting from a seriously disturbed individual.)
  131. 16:48, 20 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Dozens of ravings by a mentally ill lunatic removed, and put onto his own home page. Sysops, please see if you can stop this sick man from harassing me. Seriously. This is harassment)
  132. 16:47, 20 Aug 2003 User talk:Tlotoxl (Advice from RK. No one is censoring you; please do not believe that I am out to get you. EoT is just a very disturbed person.)
  133. 16:42, 20 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (This page is not about RK. It was a series of hatespeech, lies and slander from EntMootsofTrolls, who honestly has some sort of mental illness. His diatribes have been movedback to his page,.)
  134. 16:30, 20 Aug 2003 User talk:EntmootsOfTrolls (Moving text to here from my page. Eot's comments on me, me, me and...on me. (Sick obsession, this man has.))
  135. 16:29, 20 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Since all of this has to do with EntmootsofTrolls, and his sick obsession with me, and I am moving this text to his page. In all seriousness, this is all about EoT.)
  136. 02:36, 13 Aug 2003 Zionism and racism (What about this is contested and NPOV disputed? Unless you admit that you are a Jew-hating antisemite, what is to fear from studying history?)
  137. 02:32, 13 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Please stop the blatant anti-Semites from banning me for the sin of discussing history. This non-stop and bald-faced anti-Semitism is horrific. )
  138. 01:45, 8 Aug 2003 User talk:172 (Restoring slander, abuse and lies. 172 can try to ban me, if he wishes. But man, his outrageous anger is just really out of control.)
  139. 01:39, 8 Aug 2003 User talk:172 (Please stop the non-stop slander and lies. This is abuse.)
  140. 15:19, 7 Aug 2003 User talk:RK (I am shocked to see you so stupid, and so confused. You have thus shot your own credibility in the foot. Goodbye, 172)
  141. 23:08, 6 Aug 2003 Talk:Qibya massacre (Murdering ONLY 24 Jews is not enough to constitute terrorism? By what Nazi like standards do you operate? Please cease and desist in your hatespeech.)
  142. 14:48, 6 Aug 2003 User talk:RK (172, the problem is that Jtdirl labels most Jews and many Christians as racist bigots; so what does this tell you?)
  143. 14:38, 3 Jul 2003 Talk:Anti-Semitism (Sysops, please awar: MArtin (MyRedDice) is censoring and deleting other user's Talk discussion. I am concerned about his attempt to hide his repeated acts of Jew-baiting.)
  144. 00:58, 2 Jul 2003 Jew (Removing Ezra Wax's egregiously incorrect claims. Is he trolling? Making this stuff up? He isn't even representing the Orthodox POV. He's just wacky.)
  145. 01:51, 29 Jun 2003 Talk:Gaia hypothesis (Since you keep attacking a claim I am not making, I can only assume that you don't read English well, or you are just trolling)
  146. 01:48, 29 Jun 2003 Gaia (mythology) (Reverting Anthere's confusion. This article is about a Greek goddess, not science. Stop your trolling, Anthere,.)
  147. 01:41, 29 Jun 2003 User talk:Anthere (Anthere, stop your trolling.)

[edit] Threats of banning and demands for bans

  1. 02:38, 27 Aug 2004 Talk:Jew (Can we ban the Nazi troll? It is a violation of Wikipedia policy for such abuse to continue.)
  2. 22:30, 26 Aug 2004 Talk:Jew (NO PERSONAL ATTACKS POLICY. Removing more Nazi hatespeech against Jews. Sysops, please ban this person.)
  3. 02:51, 12 Aug 2004 Kuzari (Jayjg is censoring everything that is not Orthodox. He is now under discussion for banning.)
  4. 02:41, 12 Aug 2004 Responsa (Jayjg is censoring everything that is not Orthodox. He is now under discussion for banning.)
  5. 17:18, 11 Aug 2004 Minyan (Jayjg, stop reverting every single one of my edits. One more revert by you and will could get a one-day ban. Still, I am offering a compromise text.)
  6. 17:09, 11 Aug 2004 The Passion of the Christ (Jayjg, stop reverting every single one of my edits. One more revert by you and will could get a one-day ban.)
  7. 15:33, 11 Aug 2004 The Passion of the Christ (Jayjg, stop reverting every single one of my edits. One more revert by you and will could get a one-day ban.)
  8. 15:32, 11 Aug 2004 Minyan (Jayjg, stop reverting every single one of my edits. One more revert by you and will could get a one-day ban.)
  9. 17:54, 9 Aug 9 2004 Talk:Role of women in Judaism [1] (You are not helping us create an article; you are merely censorsing it to push your religious point of view, and that is a clear violation of Wikipedia standards that could eventually get you banned.)
  10. 20:23, 27 Jul 2004 Philosophy (Banno and Sysops, please help. Simonides is again reverting every single change made by anyone other than him. He may need to be banned.)
  11. 15:35, 22 Jul 2004 Talk:Anti-Semitism (Until Simonides agrees with mediation or is banned, there is nothing we can do. Currently, he is totally out of control.)
  12. 17:21, 21 Jul 2004 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism (Izak may need to be banned for his abusive behaviour.)
  13. 00:25, 25 Jun 2004 Talk:Zionism (ZW must be immediately banned. This is no joke. Legal action may need to be taken. NO JOKE.)
  14. 13:14, 13 Jun 2004 Palestinian views of the peace process (Please stop contantly reverting this page. Discuss issues one at a time on the "Discussion" part of this topic. Mirv, you are bordering on bannable behaviour.)
  15. 14:34, 12 Apr 2004 Talk:Palestinian views of the peace process (Removing personal insults and violation of Wikipedia protocol. Sysops, please ban MNH immediately)
  16. 15:32, 11 Apr 2004 Talk:Alternative medicine/Archive 8 (Libel by My Natural Health. Sysops, please ban him immediately.)
  17. 15:04, 11 Apr 2004 Talk:Alternative medicine/Archive 8 (Libel by My Natural Health. Sysops, please ban him immediately.)
  18. 18:04, 27 Mar 2004 Alternative medicine (Removinh nonsense from an internet vandal. Mr-Natural-Health is on the verge of being banned for his harassment)
  19. 20:48, 6 Jan 2004 Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Danny, stop vandalising this article. This is no joke. Your repeated mass deletions are censorship and may get you banned. Stop pushing your left-wing political views.)
  20. 23:45, 7 Dec 2003 User talk:Mr-Natural-Health (Just now Mr-Natural-Health sent the following private e-mail to me. If this is not grounds for immediate banning, nothing is.)
  21. 01:11, 2 Dec 2003 Talk:Dating the Bible ( stupid clueless fuck ?!?! Please ban this user.)
  22. 02:23, 21 Oct 2003 People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Adam (Lir) is censoring opinions that he wishes to hide, despite consensus of the Talk page. He is back to his old habits which got him/her banned in the past.)
  23. 23:31, 1 Sep 2003 Talk:Near sacrifice of Isaac (Rednblu admits rabidly anti-Semitic views: He believes that Jews are willing to sacrifice (murder) gentiles. Good job! Saves us the time of spending weeks trying to ban you.)
  24. 21:19, 29 Aug 2003 Talk:Ethics (Removing anonymous and signed slander and lies by EntmootsOfTrolls. This user will be banned shortly if he continues his harassment.)
  25. 01:03, 24 Aug 2003 User talk:RK/A Liberal Defense of Zionism (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Author of this article is already under consideration for banning, for his abuse.)
  26. 01:02, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban.)
  27. 00:56, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified. Netesq is now added to list of those risking a ban.)
  28. 00:54, 24 Aug 2003 User talk:RK (The pages you mention have already been decided upon as being violations of Wikipedia norms. Those people are risking bans for their harassment.)
  29. 00:49, 24 Aug 2003 Wikipedia talk:Community case RK (Reverting harassment. WikiEn list has been notified of abuse. EntmootsOfTrolls is already under warning of ban for his actions.)
  30. 22:59, 21 Aug 2003 User talk:RK/ban Archive2 (Sysops, EntmootsOfTrolls is only escalating his abuse, and is creating yet more hate filled articles. Please ban this vandal; he is totally out of hand.)
  31. 22:58, 21 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Sysops, please ban EntmootsOfTrools. He is vandalizing my user page on an hourly basis. Despite warnings from others, he just won't stop.)
  32. 22:41, 21 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Sysops, please ban EntmootsOfTrools. He is vandalizing Wikipedia on an hourly basis. This is no joke.)
  33. 18:41, 21 Aug 2003 Wikipedia:Community case RK (Reverting vandalim by EntmootsOfTrolls. Please ban that harasser.)
  34. 16:22, 21 Aug 2003 User talk:RK (SYSOP ALERT: Please ban Entmoots of trolls. This mentally ill person is again vandalizing my home page. I do not wish to initiate further action, but his sick harassment has to end.)
  35. 16:02, 21 Aug 2003 User:EntmootsOfTrolls/Ban RK (VANDALISM ALERT. Seriously, Sysops. This man appears to be mentally ill; this is no joke. Please ban him. He is totally out of control, and is raving like a demented lunatic. I )
  36. 02:34, 13 Aug 2003 Talk:Zionism and racism (The above is a classic case of bald-faced anti-Semitism. Wiki Sysops, please ban this blatant and open antisemite. )
  37. 18:07, 1 Jul 2003 Gaia philosophy (Reverting Anthere;'s POV violations, again. This is the English Wikipedia, and not Anthere's personal wish list of she wishes English speakers would use this term. Please ban that vandal. Seriously.)
  38. 02:04, 29 Jun 2003 Gaia (mythology) (Sigh. I give. This is officially a VANDALISM alert. Anthere keeps shoving science facts into this article on a Greek goddess. Please ban her.)

[edit] Earlier warning from Jimmy Wales

http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-October/007574.html

-- Dissident (Talk) 08:22, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Abusive talk page comments

Self-explanatory I think. —No-One Jones 19:11, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

  • [2] Saying that "anti-Semitic" is an inherently POV term is only used by anti-Semites. Watch your attacks carefully. You are clearly pushing anti-Semitic views with your defense of the Nazis and KKK might not be anti-Semitic. That is only pushed by Holocaust-deniers, Christian Idenitity adherents and others who hate Jews. (note that RK previously deleted the post to which he replied in this edit, so the diff is harder to read.)
  • [3] You are simply lying. You debated her above, and then a few minutes later, you debated her points below! Stop playing games. [...] Stop lying. I said the exact opposite, that I will not discuss or debate Hauptman's point of view with you. Further, stop lying about Professor Hauptman's paper; she says the exact opposite of what you claim. Your repeated lies about me and her only further diminish your credibility.
  • [4] You clearly haven't done enough reading on this subject. Stop deleting text about topics of which you do not yet know enought. You are not helping us create an article; you are merely censorsing it to push your religious point of view, and that is a clear violation of Wikipedia standards that could eventually get you banned. [...] Stop your nonsense. You know darn well that this is a mainstream modern Orthodox Jewish point of view, and your claims that I am pushing my views onto them are a damned lie. I will thank you very much to stop lying about Orthodox Jewish women and about me.
  • [5] Also, you are making up fake quotes about Conservative Judaism's founding documents. You repeatedly insert fraudulent quotes about how Conservative Jews were founded to fight against "Insane Orthodoxy and Stupid reform". The problem is that this is a bald-faced lie; none of the Conservative movement's ay anything of this sort; your so-called "quotes" are shockingly deliberate fraud meant to encourage hatred between Jews.
  • [6] You have now passed from partisan bickering into bald-faced lying. You are making up things which were not in Rabbi Regev's speech, you are falsely attributing his views to the entire Reform leadership, and you disingenuously deleted his actual quotes on the subject. Your behaviour over the last week has worsened significantly, but you outright fraud and hatespeech against non-Orthodox Jews has crossed the line.
  • [7] At this point, I am wondering if Izak may be distubred. He is now not only abusive, but ranting and raving about people accusing him of some sort of "crime". He is so clearly out of touch with reality, that he is hysterically attacking statements that no one has made. [...] Again, I am wondering i Izak may have some sort of mental illness. As readers of this page can see, no one is threatening him, or anyone else. His hysterical rants are totally out of control, and he may need to be temporarilly banned until he pulls himself together.
  • [8] Huh? You are deleting this section because too many Jews want to end discrimination against Muslims? That's anti-Semitic. [. . .] This edit is anti-Semitic, pure and simple. You want to continue the belief that the entire west hates Muslims, and that Jews hate Muslims, and you are hiding the fact that most Jews do not hate all Muslims. For shame. [. . .] Your recent actions are hysterica, a violation of Wikipedia NPOV policy, and anti-Semitic.
  • [9] You have now exposed yourself as a Muslim hating bigot. Sufi Islam is not a cult. No experts in cults in American or Europe believe that Sufi Islam is a cult. In fact, Sufi Islam is universally acknowledge by experts on Islam across the US and America as a mainstream form of Islam known for peace, tolerance and religious pluralism. You are writing hateful libel in order to slander Muslims who promote peace. This shows your bias to view violent Muslim as the only real Muslims.
  • [10] That is simply a lie. Your distortion of the content of this article, and your distortion of the views of Jewish groups, are straw-man attacks on views that are not written, not believed. Your self-proclaimed war against the Zionists has turned into classic Jew-baiting, and this is a seriou violation of Wikipedia policy. Stop the Jew-baiting at once. As you well no, no Jewish group has ever claimed that a criticism of an Israeli policy or government is anti-Semitism; no on here on Wikipedia here is saying that either. Your repeated claims to the contrary are Jew-baiting strawman attacks which are a violation of common decency.
  • [11] Since Zero has a history of supporting anti-Semites, I would not think his vote matters very much here. This is not a joke.
  • [12] We cannot unprotect the page. Simonides has vowed that he will continue to vandalize it by removing huge chunks of consensus text, and will refuse to allow anyone to do any edit at all unless he approves. He also has slandered every contributor to this page other than himself. Until Simonides agrees with mediation or is banned, there is nothing we can do. Currently, he is totally out of control.
  • [13] As Steve Rubenstein has noted, Simonides is rude and abusive, and is deleting large chunks of information to only replace them with his own personal opinions. Simonides further has a habit of inserting Muslim and Christian apologetics, and of repeatedly trying to turn this into an article on "Why Jews don't have it as bad as Muslims." He keeps reverting everyone else's additions and edits; argues with every contributor, and has assumed total ownership of this article. Jayjg, Slr and others, we need to take Simonides to arbitration, or perhaps let him know that further abuse from him will be grounds for a ban.
  • [14] Simonides' repeated claims about the Jews (e.g. that they consider all criticisms of Israel to be anti-Semitic)are Jew-baiting strawman attacks. They are not only factually false (and thus have no place in an encyclopedia), but will only serve to encourage open anti-Semitism.
  • [15] Your non-stop anti-Jewish conspiracy theories are a violation of Wikipedia etiquette and of our NPOV policy.
  • [16] The problem here was Simonides' repeated vandalism, and his conspiracy theory about "special interests", i.e. the Jews.
  • [17] Simonides keeps deleting sources and facts which back up the claims in this article, and then he makes polemical remarks about howthe resurgence of anti-Semitism is untrue and baseless. Well of course the article may appear baseless if he keeps deleting all the source material and references. But he is the one doing the censoring! Unless he wishes to accuse the EU, the Secretary General of the UN, all of he recently cited authors, and the ADL all of conspiring to lie about this rise in anti-Semitic activity, we can only conclude that he is a crank trying to make it look like Jews are liars. We shoudl not let this troll vandalize the article.
  • [18] Yet once again you have an anti-semitic bias. I can't help you, man. Get over it. [. . .]
  • [19] Zero, your outrageous lies against me do not jsutify your vandalism of this article. [. . .] Your refusal to follow NPOV policy may eventually end up getting you banned. [. . .]
  • [20] Please ignore Bk0's anti-Semitic Bible conspiracy theories. The entry on Bible conspiracy theories explains where he comes from, and it isn't anyplace historically respectable. (Note that there is currently an edit war on that article. Zero and Mustafa find the info their inconvinent, so they keep deleting it all. Zero does that on many articles.
  • [21] User ZW must be banned immediately. I do not want to have to threaten legal action, but ZW has no right to post personal information about any Wikipedia users, whether it is correct or incorrect, especially in the context of a flame war. [. . .]
  • [22] You have a wordy way of saying "I hate the Jews". Why not just say it outright? Its not like we don't understand what you are really saying.
  • [23] ero is hell bent on making Jews out look to be intolerant ethnic cleansers, and is infuriated whenever he finds Jewish words about peaceful co-existence. It is his moral blind spot.
  • [24] Martin Haper is lying. Jimbo Wales's words are quoted in full context. Martin has not "improved" the article; he has simply deleted almost every fact and quote, in order to promote his pro-Arab, anti-Israel political agenda. That is outrageous. His non-stop reverts and censorship must be stopped.
  • [25] It is now apparent that you yourself have a hatred of some rather mainstream Arab beliefs, and thus lie about Arabs themselves when they say opinions that you personally happen to disagree with. It is so sad to see someone so delusional, that they project their own liberal bias onto others, and then fly into a rage when they find out that (gasp!) others are not always liberals! [. . .] The fact of the matter is that you are slandering the Arab press as lying about their own leaders...and then claiming that all these quotes are from Israeli Jews? Are you out of your mind? You falsely claim that these quotes are from Jewish sources, when in fact they are all from Arab sources? You obviously have zero reading on this issue. Please refrain from contributing as long as you make up conspiracy theories that Jews control the Arab press, and that the Jews are faking Arab quotes in the Arab press. That's either anti-Semitic, or insane.
  • [26] [...]If you don't accept this as policy, then what about the recent story circulating on the Internet that Shahak's story was true...except that it wasn't "the Jews" who did this thing, but rather it was Dan's family! Should we now believe this about you and your family, just because someone made an outrageous claim, with no evidence? (no.) Dan, you have an unfair double-standard. When people make claims about you and your family, you demand that we do not accept such claims without proof. But when people make the exact same claims about Jews...you accept it?[...]
  • [27] Slr and Danny: It is now clear that Ezra Wax is vandalizing Wikipedia. He is totally out of control, writing pro-Ultra-Orthodox Jewish polemics and proselytization. We have attempted to work with him, but he continues to override the Wikipedia project, and refuses all attempts to maintain any type of NPOV. He is now emarking on what I can only term vandalism by inserting a large number of deliberately non-NPOV entries based on his own person view of what Judaism should be. He needs to be banned, and immediately so. He simply is writing factually false material, errors, and non-NPOV polemics faster than we can correct them. We need to ask the moderators to ban his address.

[edit] Posts to the mailing list

These are from June, July, and August 2004. They should be self-explanatory, though reading all the responses helps provide context. If the arbitrators decide that these are beyond their purview, please delete this section forthwith. —No-One Jones 19:27, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Danny is making crazy statements like this [...] The sad problem is that Danny is outrageously lying. [...] Danny's claims to the contray are so baseless that I can't fathom his mental state.[...] Danny yells at me "Causality is interpretive. You are arguing from authority, not from knowledge. I do not respond to meaningless rhetoric. Perhaps if you knew Hebrew grammar" [...] Danny is absolutely enraged that people can translate verses differently than he does, and that they can come to different conclusions than he does. [...] Danny's non-stop personal attacks, and grossly false claims about the content of the article, are a serious violation of Wikipedia etiqutte. If someone else were to do this, they would be disciplined. But what do we do when we are harassed by a Wikipedia administrator?
Unfortunately, Jayjg is not letting facts get in his way. He is intent on painting Reform Jews as viewing Orthodox Jews as terrorists and murderers.
Until a few days ago, I never saw Jayjg make false claims, but now he is going on a tear. He is doing the same thing in regards to other people and groups, which I can document if you wish. The point is that something on his side has changed, and I don't know what, or why. But we cannot allow people to insert false information bordering on libel into our articles.
Jayjg is now out of control. He is again putting forged quotes into articles, creating deliberate lies and presenting them as facts, and is editing protected articles.
He needs to be banned for at least a week, starting now.
Jayjg is the only one in the group engaging in outright fraud, the only one engaged in a non-stop series of reversions, and the only one engaging in wholesale decit...Please enforce the standard Wikipedia rules and ban him.
One man's disputation of facts is no excuse for forgery and libel. You have publicly attacked the leadership of Reform Judaism as haters of Orthodox Jews, by falsely claiming that they view Orthodox Jews as 9/11-style terrorists. Yet the text you keep inserting is a series of proven libels based not on fact, and not on quotes. [. . .]
[. . .] [Y]ou disingenuously keep deleting actual verifiable quotes from the leadership of Reform Judaism. How you can delete verifiable quotes, and substitute paranoid claims from a fanatic person who admits to hating the subject?
Jayjg has passed from partisan bickering into vandalism: He is effectively committing fraud by making up statements by "the leadership of Reform Judaism", making them out to be anti-Semites who hate Orthodox Jews.
[. . .]
The text which Jayjg keeps inserting is some sort of paranoid fantasy about the leadership of Reform Judaism slandering Orthodox Jews, in general, as being as evil as terrorists like Osama bin Ladin.
Jayjg is now committing outright vandalism by inserting fake quotes into the article on Relationship between segments of Judaism. This is not a matter of how to phrase someone's point of view in accord with NPOV policy; the problem is that he is totally fabricating beliefs and quotes, and attempting to pass them off as real. He is totally out of control.
Ray's attacks on the Jews for not forgiving Nazis is not only off-topic, but outrageously hateful. Without any exagerration, his argument comes directly from Neo-Nazi websites. This is no joke. Please look at the many Nazi websites on the Internet; they have precisely the same argument Ray uses here.
We have a serious problem with a new user, Simonides. The man is out of control. On multiple articles Simonides has attempted to take ownership of articles. He then attacks many other contributors with ad homenim attacks, slanders them, reverts all of their edits, deletes large chunks of texts from articles, and then refuses to engage in any productive discussions on the talk page.
For over a year now Zero has been taunting me with personal attacks, slander, and taunting with attacks on any Jews who differ with him. Zero constantly deletes chunks of articles, in order to censor facts that he disagrees with. Shockingly, the deleted material isn't even contested; Zero flat out admits that the groups mentioned have the views presented.
Like Zero and others, John Ball is not acting in good faith. What do we do when someone publicly states that they will refuse to follow our NPOV policy, and simply engages in non-stop revert wars to remove all POVs that they personally do not hold?
The situation with John Ball and the Islamophobia article is now totally out of hand. John Ball is also publicly slandering religious committed Muslims, such as Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, of racist anti-Islamic propaganda. That's not just incorrect, it borders on insane.
"John Ball" is revealing himself to be an Islamist contributor who wants to remove all facts, statistics and points of view from anyone who themselves is not pro-Islamist. He sees any form of Islam as an enemy, except for his own form. People like this rarely learn to follow NPOV.
The long-standing problem with Zero isn't his belief that Jews are racist. That's irrevelant. He can believe anything he likes about Jews, blacks, gays, whomever. However, the long-standing problem is that he refuses to let any POV be mentioned except his own. Zero constantly refuses to follow POV. And *that* has always been a bannable offense.
So we have a choice. (A) Ban Zero. (B) Privately talk to him, and explain that all points of view must be included, even those we happen to disagree with. And mention that discussion on Talk pages should be about how to phrase facts in the article, and not focused on one person's beliefs about the content.
Anthere has now clearly overstepped her authority. She has picked one version of an article which deleted and censored all info which did not agree with her her anti-Zionist views, and then she protected the page. This is outrageous behaviour from a Sysop.
I understand that many people here hate Israel and Jews who support it, that much has been clear for some time. But such hatred is rarely so blatant as this: To falsify history by deleting entire historical accounts and quotes, to spin a fantastic pro-Arab, anti-Zionist storyline, and to lock the article, is just too much.
User ZW must be banned immediately. I do not want to have to threaten legal action, but ZW has no right to post personal information about any Wikipedia users, whether it is correct or incorrect, especially in the context of a flame war.

[edit] Ad hominem/Poisoning the Well

Jayjg is an ultra-Orthodox Jewish contributor... Jayjg kept on acting as if every statement made contained some sort of hidden attack on his religion...However in recent days his ultra-Orthodox bias against all other forms of Judaism have overwhelmed his common sense...Readers should understand that many people in Jayjg's sect of Judaism believe that any form of Orthodox or non-Orthodox Judaism (other than their own, of course) is dangerous and dishonest... perhaps he was taught this by his teachers, and cannot believe that they misled him.
As an ultra-Orthodox Jew, Jayjg has been taught to distrust all other Jews, Orthodox and non-Orthodox. Although I feel sorry for him, I can at least try to understand why he feels that everyone is an enemy to him...
We do not care how much you and your rabbi dislike regular Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jews; that does not justify falsifying facts;
No, we will not remove these quotes that you obviously find embarassing, and wish to hide to push your Point of view. You clearly have an agenda to hide any facts about Orthodox Judaism that you find embarassing, and you have written bald-faced lies about Reform Jews, in order to make them all look like anti-Semites who hate Orthodox Jews. Your actions in recent days have been outrageous. We will not allow anyone to demnonize Reform Jews and make them look like anti-Semites. It is not a matter of a point of view; the words you wrote were flat-out lies, and had to be removed.
Unfortunately, you still have a tendency to to hide any facts about Haredi Judaism that you find embarassing, which makes it impossible to write an article.
Please stop deleting from the article all information about Haredi actions which you find embarssing; that is not NPOV, that is censorship.

[edit] Deletion of current disputes involving RK from Talk: pages

  • [34] "Removing off-topic harassment from anonymous abuser."
  • [35] "Previous discussions have now been moved to a separate article." [Note: No material was actually moved to a separate article, but simply deleted]
  • [36] "Removing inappropripare personal comments about RK's personal non-Wikipedia essays by IZak."
  • [37] "Revert anti-Semitic edits by Cadr. He has gove over-the-edge by saying that the word "anti-Semitic" is inherently POV" (RK later restored and replied to this text.)