From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

For this case, there are 13 active Arbitrators, so 7 votes are a majority.

Contents 1 Motions and requests by the parties 1.1 Motion to suspend and dismiss 2 Proposed temporary injunctions 2.1 Template 3 Proposed final decision 3.1 Proposed principles 3.1.1 Template 3.1.2 Template 3.1.3 Template 3.1.4 Template 3.1.5 Template 3.1.6 Template 3.1.7 Template 3.1.8 Template 3.1.9 Template 3.1.10 Template 3.2 Proposed findings of fact 3.2.1 Template 3.2.2 Template 3.2.3 Template 3.2.4 Template 3.2.5 Template 3.2.6 Template 3.2.7 Template 3.2.8 Template 3.2.9 Template 3.2.10 Template 3.2.11 Template 3.3 Proposed remedies 3.3.1 Template 3.3.2 Template 3.3.3 Template 3.3.4 Template 3.3.5 Template 3.3.6 Template 3.3.7 Template 3.3.8 Template 3.3.9 Template 3.3.10 Template 3.3.11 Template 3.3.12 Template 3.3.13 Template 3.4 Proposed enforcement 3.4.1 Template 3.4.2 Template 3.4.3 Template 3.4.4 Template 3.4.5 Template 3.5 Discussion by Arbitrators 3.5.1 General 3.6 Motion to close 3.6.1 Implementation notes 3.6.2 Vote

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting.
Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.

[edit] Motion to suspend and dismiss

1) R. fiend, the subject of this case, has indicated that he will resign as an administrator, thereby resolving the main issue raised by this case, if the case will then be closed. Accordingly, this case is suspended for a period of 72 hours from the adoption of this motion. If R. fiend is voluntarily desysopped during that period, this case will be automatically closed without need for a further motion or proceedings and with the following determination:

Because R. fiend (talk · contribs), the subject of this case, has resigned his adminship, this case is closed. If R. fiend wishes to seek administrator status again in the future, he may do so only through a new request for adminship. The Arbitration Committee finds that R. fiend's unexplained block of Ed Poor on October 1, 2007 was unjustified. An arbitrator will make an appropriate notation in Ed Poor's block log reflecting this determination.

If R. fiend does not resign his adminship within 72 hours after this motion is adopted, the case will resume and this motion will have no further effect.

Support:

1. Per discussion on the workshop and on User talk:Ed Poor. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Kirill 19:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
3. Sam Blacketer (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Paul August ☎ 21:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
5. FloNight (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
6. bainer (talk) 07:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
7. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 22:36, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
8. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 06:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

Adopted on 22:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC).

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

3) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

4) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

5) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

6) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

7) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

8) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

9) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

10) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

3) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

4) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

5) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

6) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

7) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

8) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

9) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

10) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

11) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

3) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

4) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

5) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

6) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

7) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

8) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

9) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

10) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

11) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

12) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

13) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

3) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

4) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

[edit] Implementation notes

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

[edit] Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.