From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

For this case, there are 13 active Arbitrators of whom none are recused, so 7 votes are a majority.

Contents 1 Motions and requests by the parties 1.1 Template 2 Proposed temporary injunctions 2.1 Template 3 Proposed final decision 3.1 Proposed principles 3.1.1 Compliance 3.1.2 Template 3.2 Proposed findings of fact 3.2.1 Contempt 3.2.2 Template 3.3 Proposed remedies 3.3.1 Ban 3.3.2 Template 3.4 Proposed enforcement 3.4.1 Template 3.5 Discussion by Arbitrators 3.5.1 General 3.6 Motion to close 3.6.1 Implementation notes 3.6.2 Vote

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting.
Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed motion}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Compliance

1) Wikipedia editors are expected to make a good faith effort to comply with policy.

Support:

1. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Kirill 23:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Fred Bauder 16:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
4. SimonP 14:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
5. Charles Matthews 09:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6. FloNight 15:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
7. James F. (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Contempt

1) Evidence has shown that Pigsonthewing (talk · contribs) disregards the Wikipedia way of doing things and is unable or unwilling to improve his pattern of participation.

Support:

1. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Kirill 23:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Fred Bauder 16:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
4. SimonP 14:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
5. Charles Matthews 09:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6. FloNight 15:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
7. James F. (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] Ban

1) Pigsonthewing's editing privileges are revoked for a period of one year.

Support:

1. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Kirill 23:09, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Fred Bauder 16:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
4. SimonP 14:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
5. Charles Matthews 09:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
6. FloNight 15:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
7. James F. (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

2) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

[edit] Implementation notes

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

[edit] Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

1. Close. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
2. Close. James F. (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
3. Close. Kirill 18:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
4. Close. SimonP 03:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
5. Close. FloNight 17:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)