Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann/Proposed decision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
For this case, there are 12 active Arbitrators, so 7 votes are a majority.
Contents |
[edit] Motions and requests by the parties
Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting.
Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.
[edit] Motion to dismiss
1) Events have overtaken this case, and the community can take care of this entire issue itself -- and is doing so. Therefore, I move to dismiss this case.
- Support:
- --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 07:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- James F. (talk) 12:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- FloNight (talk) 14:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that the case appears to be moot given recent events, including the deletion of the disputed article and the departure of User:Kingofmann from Wikipedia. If problems recur at a substantial level, which I hope they will not, a reopening can be sought. Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kirill 18:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sam Blacketer (talk) 18:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Blnguyen (bananabucket) 23:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed motion}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed final decision
[edit] Proposed principles
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
2) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
3) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
4) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
5) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
6) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
7) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
8) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
9) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
10) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed findings of fact
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
9) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
10) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
11) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
3) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
4) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
5) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
6) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
7) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
8) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
9) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
10) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
11) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
12) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
13) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Proposed enforcement
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
3) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Template
4) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators
[edit] General
[edit] Motion to close
[edit] Implementation notes
Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
[edit] Vote
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.