Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

all proposed

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
  • Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, 1 Arbitrators is/are recused (Fred) and 3 is/are inactive (Fennec, David Gerard, Sannse), so 5 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Contents

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on the discussion page.

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:


[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] No Personal Attacks

1) Wikipedia:No personal attacks

Support:
  1. →Raul654 03:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. James F. (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] No legal threats

2) Wikipedia:No legal threats

Support:
  1. →Raul654 03:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:33, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. James F. (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Legal threats

1) Keetoowah threatened legal action against User:Zoe, in violation of the No legal threats rule.

Support:
  1. →Raul654 03:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. A weak threat, but yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 20:47, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Personal attacks

2) Keetoowah made a number of personal attacks against other Wikipedians [1] [2][3]

Support:
  1. →Raul654 03:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:36, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. James F. (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] Warning for legal threats

1) Keetoowah is warned that legal threats are unacceptable. [4]

Support:
  1. →Raul654 03:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 13:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Personal attack parole

2) If Keetoowah makes a personal attack on another contibutor, an admin may ban him for a short time, up to three days.

Support:
  1. →Raul654 03:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 13:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 21:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:37, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

  1. Everything has passed. →Raul654 03:50, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Jayjg (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 23:14, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 01:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)