From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

all proposed

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

• Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
• Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
• Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if they so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.

On this case, no Arbitrators are recused and 3 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority (9 active).

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Contents 1 Motions and requests by the parties 1.1 Motion to dismiss 2 Proposed temporary injunctions 2.1 Template 2.2 Template 2.3 Template 2.4 Template 2.5 Template 2.6 Template 3 Proposed final decision 3.1 Proposed principles 3.1.1 Template 3.1.2 Template 3.1.3 Template 3.1.4 Template 3.1.5 Template 3.1.6 Template 3.1.7 Template 3.1.8 Template 3.1.9 Template 3.1.10 Template 3.2 Proposed findings of fact 3.2.1 Template 3.2.2 Template 3.2.3 Template 3.2.4 Template 3.2.5 Template 3.2.6 Template 3.2.7 Template 3.2.8 Template 3.2.9 Template 3.2.10 Template 3.2.11 Template 3.3 Proposed remedies 3.3.1 Template 3.3.2 Template 3.3.3 Template 3.3.4 Template 3.3.5 Template 3.3.6 Template 3.3.7 Template 3.3.8 Template 3.3.9 Template 3.3.10 Template 3.3.11 Template 3.3.12 Template 3.3.13 Template 3.4 Proposed enforcement 3.4.1 Template 3.4.2 Template 3.4.3 Template 3.4.4 Template 3.4.5 Template 3.5 Discussion by Arbitrators 3.5.1 General 3.6 Motion to close 3.6.1 Implementation notes 3.6.2 Vote

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop.

[edit] Motion to dismiss

1) The parties in this matter have produced very little useable evidence. This matter is dismissed for lack of evidence.

Support:

1. Fred Bauder 19:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
2. The dispute seems mostly dead [1][2], and one of the parties has dropped the issue [3]. Dmcdevit·t 21:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
3. SimonP 23:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
4. ➥the Epopt 15:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
5. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:04, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
6. Charles Matthews 21:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:

Oppose:

Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

[edit] Implementation notes

Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

A majority has voted to dismiss this case for lack of evidence of ongoing disruption. I have moved the case to "Motion to close" because I am not sure whether the vote on the motion to dismiss is enough. Arbitrators please either vote to close or let the clerks know if the above motion is sufficient. Thatcher131 02:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

1. Close Fred Bauder 03:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
2. Close. - SimonP 04:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
3. Close. Charles Matthews 21:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
4. Close. Dmcdevit·t 01:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
5. Close. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)