Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

all proposed

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop place proposals which are ready for voting here.

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed.
  • Items that receive a majority "oppose" vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority "support" or "oppose" vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if she/he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.


On this case, 3 Arbitrator(s) is/are recused and 1 is/are inactive, so 10 out of 14 arbitrators are available and 6 votes are a majority.

For all items

Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

Contents

[edit] Motions and requests by the parties

Place those on /Workshop.

[edit] Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:


[edit] Proposed final decision

[edit] Proposed principles

[edit] Following Arbitration decisions

1) Users are expected to comply with Arbitration decisions.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 01:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Jayjg (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 05:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed findings of fact

[edit] -Ril- is the banned user CheeseDreams

1) Based on analysis of editing themes, certain stylistic idiosyncrasies, and his pattern of litigiousness it is determined that -Ril- (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) is CheeseDreams (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log). See Edit by a sock revealed through checkuser and Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/-Ril-_2/Evidence#-Ril-_is_a_reincarnation_of_CheeseDreams, especially some highly distinctive stylistic quirks shared by -Ril- and CheeseDreams. These include that they both unusually put a period between the "r" and the "v" when using the abbreviation for revert. (CheeseDreams: [1], [2], [3], [4], -Ril-: [5], [6], [7], [8]). They also both frequently write "P.s." with an odd combination of an upper case "P" and lower case "s". (CheeseDreams: [9], [10], [11], [12], -Ril-: [13], [14]).

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 01:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Jayjg (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 05:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Penalty for CheeseDreams editing under a another account

2) Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams 2#Account restriction 2 provides that, should CheeseDreams edit using any other account, that account should be blocked indefinitely.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 01:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Jayjg (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 05:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

[edit] -Ril- blocked indefinitely

1) -Ril- is blocked indefinitely.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 01:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Jayjg (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 05:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] CheeseDreams ban extended

2) CheeseDreams is banned for an additional year.

Support:
  1. Fred Bauder 17:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. James F. (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Sam Korn (smoddy) 20:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. ➥the Epopt 01:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  5. Jayjg (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
  6. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 05:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Proposed enforcement

[edit] Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Support:
Oppose:
Abstain:

[edit] Discussion by Arbitrators

[edit] General

[edit] Motion to close

[edit] Implementation notes

Clerks and arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.

[edit] Vote

Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.

  1. Nothing left here, looks like. Close. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  2. close ➥the Epopt 14:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  3. Close. Sam Korn (smoddy) 16:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
  4. Close. Jayjg (talk) 04:46, 28 March 2006 (UTC)