Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/oo7565

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] oo7565

Final (0/8/0); Ended 11:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

oo7565 (talk · contribs) - i have been here for over a year and made many great edits during that timeOo7565 06:07, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: i would help anywhere where help is needed. i would proberly many work in prods and AFD's and welcomming people to wikipedia and help fight vandlism.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: proberly the many high school articles i have started also i like to work on the sports articles also i like to work on the anime articles but many the Negima! article i have work on the most. also i do i lot of tags edits like clean up and expand and unfef tags i put on articles. also i like to welcomming people om wikipedia
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: i do not bevile i have been in a edit conflict per say. i did have a rough start on here at first with poicles but i have overcome them now. i guess i would say i been in more missunderstandings then conflicts. like when i would leave prod notes on the article creators talk page they would come and get mad at me for proding there articles i would tell them i was just telling them that someone else proded there article not me.

[edit] General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/oo7565 before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

thanks for all who have voice your voice on my rfa to be honest i rather let this run it couse and not withdraw this but i am takeing what some of you are saying to me and withdrawing this afd for now and for i to come back in a mounth or 2 okOo7565 09:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose has only made about 2000 edits since he joined. His spelling in his answers is terrible. He's a very arrogant self-nominator. I almost think this is a joke Black Harry 06:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
    first this is no joke. i know i made a mistake in the first line i wrote about myself i proberly should have said i have made many good edits on wikipedia. and if i came across as arrogane i am sorry about that i did not mean too. one more thing about the spelling it my fault about that as well i am very sorry about that please forgive meOo7565 07:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
    "one more thing about the spelling it my fault about that as well" Apparently your grammar is awful too. And I went through your edit history in the mainspace, and it seemed like every edit was either 'added cleanup tag' or 'added expand tag' or 'prod2 agree with original prod'. I have a feeling in your still in high school, and apparently you love creating article on High Schools. If you get to be an admin, I should be too Black Harry 07:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Oppose obviously. Please withdraw this nomination. It will not succeed, I assure you. --Deskana (talk) 06:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Oppose self-evident. Chensiyuan 06:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
    i do understand that but there no harm in trying is there. Also i am trying to see if this works the first time. then if it fails i hope to learn from what people write about me on here so i know what i need to improve on here to hopefully become a admin at this time or in the furture i hope that okOo7565 06:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Not enough experience, bad spelling (a pet peeve of mine), and the answers to the questions just did not sit well with me. I suggest a withdraw to avoid a SNOW, and gain experience before trying again. Good luck though! :) Jmlk17 07:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose with Moral Support Weak answers and poor spelling and construction. However lets asuume good faith. Thank you for your efforts and I hope that you do learn from this RfA and do not feel discouraged by what I suspect will be a long line of opposes. Pedro |  Chat  07:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  6. Oppose. You don't need more edits, but you do seriously need to demonstrate more understanding of Wikipedia and a better ability to communicate. For now, I'd suggest withdrawing. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 08:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  7. Inability to communicate with any degree of efficiency. Has not demonstrated an ability to show good judgement, and no evidence of dedication to the project and its' fundamental goals. Daniel 10:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  8. Oppose Good edit summary usage, you joined in 2006 but did not become active until a few months ago, I think its important for an admin to know how to communicate well with other editors and I stopped counting at 10 typos, the word I is usually capitalised mid-sentence too. Kindest Regards — The Sunshine Man 11:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.