Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/munkee madness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] munkee_madness

(1/5/0) FINAL; Ended 19:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

munkee_madness (talk · contribs) - i have been editing Wkikpedia for somtime now and i think that i finaly should go to the next level.Munkee madness 18:41, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I nominated myself so it should be obvious but yes i accept --Munkee madness 18:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: i haven't really decided, but i'll tak it as it comes.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: my best contibution in my opinion would probabaly be my creation and unstubbing of the page Nyeusigrube. unfourtunatly it was AfD'd and the result was delete.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: as stated above, several of my pages were deleted. i just rolled with the punches.

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:
Requests for adminship/munkee madness

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/munkee_madness before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

Support

  1. Strong moral support. —AldeBaer 19:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Even though you've been here for awhile, I don't think you have enough experience. I think you should withdraw from this RfA, wait a few months, get more experience in Wikipedia policy as well as main space edits, and answer the questions thoughtfully next time. DarthGriz98 18:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
    i did answer thoughtfully. here's a phrase for you uncooked spagetti may be harder but it doesn't taste as good before its cooked. --Munkee madness 19:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
    I believe Griz might be referring to your answer to Question 1, which doesn't indicate that you've given this much thought. Cheers, Lanky TALK 19:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Oppose Nothing personal, but your lack of edits and the fact you feel your best achievement is a deleted article doesn't inspire confidence. Cheers, Lanky (TALK) 18:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
    sorry, but if you want something different i was a major contributer to the streamlining of the plot section of The Princess Bride (film) --Munkee madness 19:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
    lanky your right about the fact that admis shouldn't be super. i'm surprised you didn't support this thank you. Munkee madness 19:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Oppose The content of your edits and answers to the questions leave no indication that you need the administrative tools or understand what they are. I would suggest reviewing the tools that admins have before deciding if that's what you actualy want to do or not. Leebo T/C 19:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
    ok. i reveiwed them. i already knew what they were, but thanks for the reminder. --Munkee madness 19:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
    If that's the case, can you give us examples of why you think you need them or proof that you know how to use them properly? Nothing like that is mentioned in the answers to the questions. I recommend, as Darthgriz did, that you withdraw this request for now. Leebo T/C 19:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Oppose for now. Get some more experience and come back in a few months. User may also benefit from some mentoring if interested in helping out as an admin. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose per answers to Q1 and Q2 — don't see that you have a need for the tools. —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb ) 19:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.