Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/hockeypuck990

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] Hockeypuck990

Closed per WP:SNOW. Tiptoety talk 00:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Final tally: (0/4/0); Originally scheduled to end 04:29, 19 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: I would like to monitor the sports and pittsburgh areas of wikipedia.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: I have been contributing for years and writing articles. I believe I have earned the right to finally become an admin.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:I never get stressed because I do not let people on the internet get to me. If I ever had a problem I would talk to the other user and calmly explain to them my issues.

[edit] General comments

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/hockeypuck990 before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support
[edit] Oppose
  1. Oppose and speedy per WP:SNOW. Adam McCormick (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Oppose Sorry, but with only 7 edits, you won't have the experience necessary to be an admin. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Oppose - and support speedy closing. Generally 5,000 edits are prefered, not 7. John Carter (talk) 23:56, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - recommend candidate withdrawl. SpencerT♦C 00:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutral
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.