Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/hehehehehehehe

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

This is one of the few RFA's that a non-bureaucrat would close per WP:SNOW. User has 23 edits to date. CattleGirl ^{talk | sign!} 08:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hehehehehehehe

Voice your opinion (0/2/0); Scheduled to end 06:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

hehehehehehehe (talk · contribs) - good looking 28 degree in scienceHehehehehehehe 06:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: all of it

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: everything coz im good

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:nope not yet

[edit] General comments

• See hehehehehehehe's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for hehehehehehehe: Hehehehehehehe (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/hehehehehehehe before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

Support

Oppose

1. Speedy close per WP:SNOW. Clearly not a serious application - user has 23 edits. Orderinchaos 08:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
2. For once I can't even give moral support. The flippant answers to the questions suggest that this may be a joke. Walton^{alternate account} 08:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.