Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/carbine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.


[edit] Carbine

Final (0/1/0) ended 09:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Carbine (talk · contribs) – beleive i should be nominated because i have done alot for wikipedia in my time i have worked hard to make sure the community keeps growing. I believe in unity and thats what i will bring to the job. i am currently working hard in my postion with the wikipedia anti vandilsm unit to keep wikipedia clean and great as it should be. I am also a member of community justice. wikipedia is the greastest information source and i hope will continue to do this. Carbine 09:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

Oppose

  1. Strong oppose, Malformed RfA request [1] shows very clearly your inexperience and lack of understanding of instructions. No moral support here, sorry. Please come back in 3-6 months when you're more familiar with Wikipedia and the scope of sysop tasks. I urge you to withdraw your nomination now before an avalaunche of oppose votes come in. Kimchi.sg 09:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A:
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.