Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xunex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Xunex

Final (0/5/3) ended 13:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Xunex (talk · contribs) Remember, our burdened goal is to provide all knowledge to the deserving humans. 01:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I accept nomination


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I want to sop unnecessary vandalism. That doesn't mean I'm against article creation. I'm also eager to help Wikipedia with technical situations and to help Wikipedia in a greater effect.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: I am pleased with the creation of the article of Knicks-Nuggets Brawl. I am pleased with every single contribution I have made to help Wikipedia.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: No, however if I am in any conflicts I would like resolve in a diplomatic manner and according to the guidelines of Wikipedia: Resolving Disputes

General comments

I'm a proud Wikipedian and I shall wisely contribute to Wikipedia continuously. I believe that Wikipedia, by 2010 or soon shall have the entire (well, the main parts and facts) database of knowledge. This is thanks to all the Wikipedians and the anonymous contributors.

My quest for becoming a administrator is only to contribute in more ways than right now, to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia..

Feel free to check my record of contributions. Support me and Wikipedia, please. Thank You.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Definitely NOT. I think the answer is fairly obvious. Did you even take the time to look at recent RFAs? If you did, you probably would not have submitted this RFA, let alone in a malformed state. – Chacor 01:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Firm oppose You have no experience, no skill, and very few edits. Also, your RfA application is malformed. I strongly suggest that youn withdraw, and re-apply in perhaps six or nine months.--Anthony.bradbury 01:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. You're just too inexperienced at this point for me to support you. If you want to stop vandalism, there's plenty you can do without blocking users. Read all about it at WP:RCP. If you want to become an administrator, I'd suggest spending some time doing that or participating in WP:AFDs. Articles for deletion is a good way to learn various policies related to article deletion, which is a big sysop chore around here. Best of luck.--Kchase T 12:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  4. Speedy close. Lack of experience, and this RfA wasn't even submitted properly in the first place. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 13:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose and suggest withdrawal:Not enouh experience, Q1 shows you don't really need the tools.--Wizardman 13:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Neutral. You have fewer than 500 edits to the project. While we welcome your contributions, that doesn't give us much room to judge how good an admin you'd be. Why don't you stick around for a few months, editing some more articles and reverting vandalism you find. You can then think about reapplying. But I suggest you withdraw this request for adminship as I'm afraid it doesn't have much chance of succeeding at the moment. WJBscribe (WJB talk) 12:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Neutral Potential to be an admin, but needs more experience.--Runcorn 13:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  3. Neutral: Sorry, you have good intentions, but you need more experience. S.D. ¿п? § 13:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.