Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/StephenHjellum13 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] StephenHjellum13

Final (0/5/0); Withdrawn by administrator Tiptoety per WP:SNOW at 01:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

StephenHjellum13 (talk · contribs) - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER StephenHjellum13 00:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)



[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A:Any and all.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: Those to Davis, California in adding a page to its train station, because that has some historic values to Davis.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Not That I remember.

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:
Requests for adminship/StephenHjellum13 Requests for adminship/StephenHjellum13 2

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/StephenHjellum13 before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support
[edit] Oppose
  1. Oppose - Even though this isn't transcluded properly right now - experience my friend. I'm afraid that you lack it currently. Suggest taking 5-6 months and do some heavy mainspace editing. Also suggest getting yourself an WP:ADMINCOACH and going for editor review after a few months time for an evaluation. You are most certainly welcome to come back and try again. Good luck dude. Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Oppose - 69 mainspace edits, far too few to judge if you would make a good admin or not. Suggest an early withdrawl. VegaDark (talk) 00:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Oppose - I suggest withdrawal from this RfA, since it has pretty much no chance of passing. Try again later, but not too soon. —  scetoaux (T/C) 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - Sorry, but this is too early still. Soxred93 | talk bot 00:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Oppose - per VegaDark. You have 240 userspace edits, but only 69 namespace edits, and very little talk. It also seems you have edited only in very, very obscure articles that, though I haven't checked, tell me if I'm wrong, have been very uncontroversial. This also reflects in the the answer to Q3. Each of the answers were also very short, probably because you don't have a lot to talk about yet. KV(Talk) 00:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutral
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.