Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Scarbor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
[edit] Scarbor
Discuss here (0/0/0) Ending 14:42, 2006-07-13 (UTC)
Scarbor (talk · contribs) – Der Loewe Schlaft nie! Scarbor 14:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I agree.
- Support
- Oppose
- Neutral
- Comments
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A: Deletion and adminship.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A: Torchwood!
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: No.
- Hi Scarbor, I think you may have meant to put this on the main article, not its talk page. You might also like to consider if you want to apply for adminship at this time. Your request would stand almost no chance of succeeding right now. Your answers above make it appear that you don't fully understand the role of admins on Wikipedia and you have so far made only a relatively small number of contributions. In general most editors are looking for a substantial records of at least 2000 edits over several months before they would support a request for adminship. Good luck, Gwernol 14:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
