Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Save the Humans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] Save the humans

Final (1/6/0); Closed by Anthøny at 22:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Save the humans (talk · contribs) - Wel I try my best to help Wikipedia. What else can I Say.  :) Save The Humans:) RFA :) 21:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Well since I am Self-nominated of coarse I accept. It is Worth Mentioning that before I Changed my user name, I had a previous RFA under the user name Iwilleditu.

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: Mainly Edit Wars, Dispute Resolution, Dispute Intervention, and Wikiprojects.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: My Best Contributions I would say is WP:Sims.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Yes (Just A Little one) I reported a Wikiquette alert on a User. Now I Notice that I Overreacted.

Optional question from Iridescent

4. Would you care to explain this?

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:

    Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Save the humans before commenting.

    [edit] Discussion

    [edit] Support
    1. Clearly well versed in all aspects of policy. naerii - talk 21:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
      Is that sarcasm? =P weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    [edit] Oppose
    1. Oppose regretfully per this and lack of experience in admin-related areas, IMHO. Sorry again and good luck in the future. Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 21:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    2. Oppose - Editcounts are A Bad Thing etc etc but you have less than 50 mainspace edits - we've nothing to judge you on. — iridescent 21:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    3. Oppose, with strongest possible moral support. Good attitude, but not much experience, and you're canvassing through your signature. Sorry, weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    4. Please come back in say 6 months time showing experience in admin areas and ill take another look. Id withdraw this because i know many will agree with me. Might make things easier for ya :). Seddon69 (talk) 21:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    5. Oppose, the answer to Q1 provides no indication as to how this user would use the admin tools in the areas identified. TerriersFan (talk) 21:48, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    6. Oppose but with moral support due to lack of experience but with absolutely no prejudice against supporting in a few months when you have a wider experience of admin-related areas. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 21:49, May 11, 2008 (UTC)
    [edit] Neutral
    The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.