Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Saturation2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Saturation2

Voice your opinion (0/5/0); Scheduled to end 03:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Saturation2 (talk · contribs) - I would like to nominate myself because I had over 150 concecutive edits. I am also using anti-vandal-tool for spell checking (which I'm carefully introduced). I am also trying to be very good at rpp for pages. You might've been thinking that I am going to let you look at my userbox page. Saturation2 Talk to me, or you can at my edits. Sign here if you love me. 03:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Oh, and I am a very nice username. Make sue you adopt me according to my userbox page. Cheers!

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with?
A: I would like to delete and undelete pages, protect and unprotect pages, block and unblock users, and even use a rollback (or revert) function (I know I use TWINKLE and anti-vandal-yool, but that's okay.).
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: Correcting typos and warn users because that was my job to do.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Have you noticed that no one is causing me stress? I am 100% unstressed (except my stuffy nose I had last night). I'll think I will be better soon in the furure.
General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose too few mainspace edits, can't support. WooyiTalk, Editor review 03:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Strong oppose per very poor answers and poor selfnom. Did you even read WP:GRFA? Not experienced enough, if at all. – Chacor 03:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Strongest oppose. Remember LegoAxiom? This is likeis his twin brother here. I traced this request from a frivolous sockpuppetry report based on a frivolous vandalism accusation. -Amarkov moo! 03:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Oppose, please withdraw or have this closed early. --Coredesat 03:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose. You mean well, but you've edited for two days.--Wizardman 03:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.