Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rock's rock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Rock's rock

Final (0/6/0) ended 00:09, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Rock's rock (talk · contribs) – I'v been here a few days and think this is a good site and i'd be a good admin. I accept my nom.Rock's rock 23:30, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
Oppose
  1. Oppose Candidate has only two edits, which create this RfA. The RfA itself is malformed. I suggest the candidate withdraws. Message left on candidate's talk page. Gwernol 23:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  2. oppose to gain adminship, the best thing to do is solidly contribute for a few months, get involved in wikiprojects etc Benon 23:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  3. Close this, quickly. --Golbez 23:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
  4. Please close this RfA for obvious reasons... G.He 00:02, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose. Gah... Freddie Message? 00:06, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  6. Oppose - doesn't have enough experience to know that he/she doesn't have enough experience for an rfa. --GeorgeMoney T·C 00:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A:
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A:
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:


The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.