Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rewired

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Rewired

Final (0/3/0) Ended 18:39, 29 October 2006

Rewired (talk · contribs) – Over 2000 edits. Rewired 17:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

you bet

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: banning the most obvious vandals
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: no because nobody told me what to edit so everything i did was worthless
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: just aspergers but everyone has it here
General comments

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose no real reasons given. --Alex (Talk) 17:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  2. STRONG OPPOSE - User has 9 edits and answers to questions seem like jokes. --Db099221 17:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose and urge immediate delisting due to the facetious answer to question three. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 18:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
    I didn't want to argue with any of the possible oppose votes but there is no sarcasm in what I said Rewired 18:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  4. Obvious Oppose. Either this is a joke or the editor did not do any homework before nominating himself. Both are good reasons for immediate delisting. SuperMachine 18:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.