Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ral315

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Ral315

Final (27/1/0) ended 16:36 10 September 2005 (UTC) Ral315 (talk · contribs) - I think Ral315 should be an admin. He seems to be a reasonably good Wikipedian, and is doing a great benefit to Wikipedia by editing the Wikipedia Signpost. He has 2846 edits, which seems to be plenty enough. --— JIP | Talk 16:36, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I have to admit, I'm a bit shocked, but I accept. Ral315 04:32, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Seen him everywhere too. Nominator was supposed to do this, but oh well.

    V. Molotov


    20:02, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  2. That's hot. Mike H (Talking is hot) 02:07, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  3. That's spicy (yes) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 02:30, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  4. That's a spicy meatball. Andre (talk) 02:32, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  5. That's sweet and sour, and I thought he was one. --Merovingian (t) (c) 02:33, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  6. That's... er, support-worthy. Dmcdevit·t 07:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support – sensible candidate. Plus doing a lot of good work for WP. User:Nichalp/sg 07:19, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  8. Tasty support. - Darwinek 07:44, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  9. Support – yes, it is tasty, courtesy Darwinek. --Bhadani 08:25, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  10. Support, yes I forgot to add my own vote, here it is. — JIP | Talk 10:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

  11. Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

  12. Support -- Joolz 15:49, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  13. BRIAN0918 • 2005-09-4 17:36
  14. Support, before he fires me from the Signpost! the wub "?/!" 17:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support- he he, I'm a special contributor, and immune from firing! ;-) (not really, but...) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 18:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  16. Support. Mommy, what's men-stru-a-tion? Redwolf24 (talk) 21:22, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  17. SupportTrevor MacInnis(Talk | Contribs) 00:17, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  18. Support Very active doing janitorial tasks, and should benefit with all the admin tools. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:47, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  19. Support. Very good contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:31, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  20. Impressed by his initiative at WP:POST Ingoolemo talk 07:55, 2005 September 5 (UTC)
  21. Support. Meets my guidelines. android79 19:37, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
  22. Michael Snow 20:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
  23. That's enough of the comments... and support. Bratschetalk | Esperanza 21:45, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
  24. Support. El_C 23:59, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
  25. Support this dedicated contributor. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:49, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  26. David Gerard 14:13, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  27. Support no prob. Alf melmac 22:22, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 06:17, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I would take care of speedied articles, and closing VFD debates. Also, I plan to help with the copyvio backlog, which seems to grow every day.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I don't really do that much work on articles in general; I try mostly to keep to janitorial-type work like removing double-redirects, RC and New Pages patrol, etc. My favorite work right now is (temporarily) publishing the Signpost every week.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I was once (about three months ago) blocked for 24 hours for violation of the 3RR. The page I was reverting was a user page that promoted warez; I removed the information. After being banned, another user added a speedy tag, and the article was deleted. I will not do this in the future, and other than this incident, I've had relatively few conflicts, and the others have been resolved quite peacefully and cheerfully.