Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Naan Kadavul

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Naan Kadavul

Final (0/11/0) ended 16:32 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Naan Kadavul (talk · contribs) – Dedication, concentration, and skill is needed to Wikipedia, this long withstanding project has helped many of the public across the globe in their research of modern and past history. This shall continue if you can vote for me, I shall put aside all vandalists. Now I have not got the power to get rid of them, please make me an admin so I can make Wikipedia a better place. Naan Kadavul 13:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept this nomination as all my spare time nowadays is put into improving Wikipedia.

Support

  1. You will recieve my support as you have spent mountains of time!!
    I'm User:Jayjig and I will support you on your Wikiquest.

Oppose

  1. Strong oppose, of course. 47 edits as of toolserver lag, forging support votes, 2 failed nom attempts. --Rory096 15:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
    His upload log.... --Rory096 15:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. This RfA is a total joke. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 15:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. Somebody delist this. Mackensen (talk) 15:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  4. Per Mackensen. - Mailer Diablo 15:33, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  5. Strong Oppose, impersonation of other users, low edit count, lacks of experience. Delist it, bad joke RFA. --Terence Ong 15:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Strongest Oppose, per all the above, particularly stuffing of ballot. A bad joke. Consider a block for disruption if bad faith can be conclusively demonstrated. Badgerpatrol 15:47, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  7. Strong Oppose, only present for 10 days? It takes months to learn how to work as an admin! Sorry man... --Tone 15:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  8. Speedy Oppose (is there such thing ?) Suggest B'Crat early closure, and think pile on oppose votes would be of little benefit, as it all seems to be said in the first few! MartinRe 15:52, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  9. Strong Oppose as per Rory's comments on AN:I. May need a block for disruption aside from this disaster. --InShaneee 16:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  10. Oppose One day you may make a fine admin, but it usually takes a few months of time on wikipedia and a few thousand edits before that time comes. You also haven't completed your RFA as you never inserted the time of closing at the top. You may want to consider withdrawing your RFA and reapplying in a few months time. --Bachrach44 16:17, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
    I doubt that will be happening, as he's indefinitely blocked. --Rory096 16:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
  11. Strong oppose for the same reasons mentioned above; I strongly advise the candidate to withdraw the nomination until a lot more experience has been gained. Bucketsofg✐ 16:21, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
    The candidate is currently blocked for disruption and vote forgery, someone else will have to withdraw for him. Crat's around? JoshuaZ 16:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

Username   Naan_Kadavul
Total edits     280
Distinct pages edited   76
Average edits/page      3.684
First edit      13:10, May 1, 2006
        
(main)  192
User    11
User talk       13
Image   52
Wikipedia       12
    • Note that the image uploads appear to be mostly copyvios. --Rory096 15:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Cricket related work, Football - Premiership and Championship. Come on u Gunners in the Champions league, Tamil Film Industry, Hollywood Movies, Actors, Actresses, Physics, Business Studies, Maths theories.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: My home page is about me. But I am not so famous that my name should appear on specific articles.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I see how it goes, then post a message on a notice board for discussion, if this doen't work i tell an admin to sort out differences. I am looking to become an admin to help the rest of the Wikipedia users.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.