Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mulad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Mulad

final (21/0/0) ending 01:35 5 June 2005 (UTC)

Mulad is an excellent contributor with 11444 edits as of this time. EdwinHJ | Talk 01:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

After mulling it over a bit, I accept the nomination. —Mulad (talk) 05:01, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support As the nominator I support, of course. EdwinHJ | Talk 01:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support.-gadfium 05:12, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  3. Cool. JuntungWu 13:35, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  4. An outstanding contributor, especially to Minnesota related articles. Works well with others, and should make an excellent admin. Jonathunder 15:50, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
  5. Strong Support- Over 11 thousand edits?! Two years?! I'm impressed! Flcelloguy 17:16, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  6. Andre (talk) 19:27, May 30, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Without a doubt. Hedley 22:01, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
  8. Strong support Tuf-Kat 01:04, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
  9. support - very impressive, and appears to have some development ideas working too, according to his user page. Grutness...wha? 01:17, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
  10. Support Wow. How could I not, looking at the excellent edits? Good job... Bratschetalk random 01:42, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support (Why did I think he was already one?) Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:35, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
  12. Don't recall seeing him around, but his record's impressive enough that I'll support anyway. Everyking 09:40, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
  13. No big deal. Bishonen | talk 20:17, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
  14. Support. Quite impressive record. — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:32, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  15. support Kingturtle 18:48, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  16. Support No big deal! We need more admins who don't participate in wikipedia: too much. --Gmaxwell 21:49, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  17. Support--Duk 16:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  18. 11,444 edits? Dang! Support. Fire Star 01:36, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  19. Support--dml 18:55, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support with bells on! jengod 08:11, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
  21. Neutralitytalk 08:12, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I would likely be a "no big deal" sysop, at least at the beginning. I occasionally appear in the Wikipedia: namespace, but spend most of my time on articles. My appearances there would probably increase to an extent, but I'd mostly be looking forward to that rollback button for fixing vandalism...
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I believe that articles are always works-in-progress, but I've always thought that the Twin City Rapid Transit history was one of my better contributions (a companion article of sorts to Hiawatha Line, describing the reincarnation of rails in my city 50 years later). A combination of my interest in Minnesota, history, and technology. I have also helped document the history of notable broadcasters in my area (Minnesota Public Radio, WCCO, KSTP, etc.), and I have occasionally done some significant cleanup on the article for The Daily Show. Ralph Samuelson was recently on the Main Page as a Did you know? topic. Dunno if I'll ever manage that featured article, though ;-)
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. Only minor things, really. Occasional fluctuations in my memory have caused erroneous edits from time to time (I hate finding out that I'm wrong ;-) I often avoid controversial topics, but can handle them if I am able to ascertain facts from reliable references.