Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Me and my robot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Me and my robot

Final (0/5/0) Ended Sat, 25 Nov 2006 03:45:17 (UTC)

Me and my robot (talk · contribs) – A user who has done nothing but help. solid user Time is always right 02:41, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I accept Me and my robot 02:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Fighting vandalism, blocking those who vandalize.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: Creating pages for music singles
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I have had no conflicts.
General comments

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Nomination was made by single-purpose account. Likely sockpuppet. --Nlu (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  2. Oppose you have fewer than 100 edits, this means we don't have enough evidence to know whether you can be trusted with the admin tools. Your talk page shows you don't properly understand our image licensing policy, which is an important area for an admin to have experience in. I would add that accepting a nomination from an editor whose only edits are to nominate you is highly suspicious and speaks to a lack of judgement on your part. Sorry, Gwernol 02:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  3. Strong Oppose, excuse me if I am sounding rude but you don't even have 100 edits. The questions are very, very weak and the user who nominated you hardly has any edits either. I would recomend withdrawing you RFA.__Seadog ♪ 03:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
    Comment, I change that the user who nominated you has no mainspace edits and the only edits made are regarding this RFA.__Seadog ♪ 03:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose and suggest withdrawal. Your edit count is too low, your answers give us no idea of what you intend to do with the sysop flag. Alphachimp 03:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose per above. ViridaeTalk 03:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.