Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Madviolinist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] Madviolinist

Final (0/4/0); Ended 07:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC) - closed by -- Anonymous DissidentTalk as WP:SNOWed. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Madviolinist (talk · contribs) - Hello, I am Madviolinist. I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time under another username, but due to some drama issues, I have chosen to run under a different alias. On my previous account,(which name I would not like to mention) I have taken part in multiple Wikiprojects, one mainly Military History. I have taken part in WP:CSD and WP:AFD, and I was equipped with WP:VandalProof and WP:AWB. While I realize that this RFA has little or no chance of passing, all that I am asking is that you would not take the drama from my previous account into account in this RFA.

I am not either 1 or 2.

Madviolinist (talk) 05:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: AFD closing, helping out in AIV, taking part in administrative tasks in smaller WikiProjects, CSD. I will also help out in page protection.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: Some of my best work in my previous account would have gone into the Military history WikiProject.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I usually try to deal with my problems calmly and quietly, with as little stress as possible. I will compare thoughts and ideas with other users and come up with the best.

[edit] General comments

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Madviolinist before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support
[edit] Oppose
  1. Strong Oppose Very, very little experience. I suggest running on the account you actually contributed more to. I suggest withdrawing this RFA or else this will be snowballed.--RyRy5 (talk) 06:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Oppose, hasn't edited for four months then applies for adminship, sorry, I suggest withdrawing this, very little experience (for this account), can you prove that you have another account and that that one has experience? Because we're voting on this account, and to just say "I had another account with more experience" just isn't enough I'm afraid. The DominatorTalkEdits 06:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. (e.c.) Oppose. Apart from you not revealing your old accounts, which is a show-stopper already, you have a total of 28 edits as this account. This is way below par. If you don't want to be associated with the "drama" of your old accounts, you also can't take the credit for their experience. Moreover, a brief glance at your contributions indicates that you do not yet seem to have the experience required for the job. The article you created, Sextilia, is unsourced and your only AfD contibution is poorly argued. I recommend withdrawal. Sandstein (talk) 06:16, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Strong oppose it seems likely that you are a sockpuppet account of User:Redmarkviolinist despite your claim that you are not. The fact that you are attempting to use this sock account to hide you previous problems on another account is clearly abusive. If you really are redmarkviolinist, then your use of a sockpuppet to attempt to subvert the RfA process is a blockable offense. I suggest you tell us who your other accounts are and immediately withdraw this RfA. Gwernol 06:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutral


The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.