Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Llamadog903
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Llamadog903
[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Llamadog903|action=edit}} Vote here] (0/3/0) ending 20:46 8:42pm, march 3 2006 (UTC)
Llamadog903 (talk · contribs) – funny, smart, and helpful Llamadog903 20:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
I accept this nomination!
Support
Oppose
Strongest oppose this user is welcoming dozens of users ([1]) that don't exist ([2]). Why? I like to assume good faith, but I can only imagine this is because of this comment [3] about this RFA that was later blanked [4]. Not a reasonable request here. I hope Llamadog will withdraw his nomination, and stop creating junk articles. Some poor admin is going to have to speedy all those. Gah.Mangojuice 01:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)- Umm... Hac55 does exist. See here. You have to type in the user as the user who performed the action (i.e. created the username), not the recipient. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was just trying to change my vote to reflect that. I apologized to Llamadog903 just now on his talk page. I still oppose, though, for the talk page blanking. Mangojuice 02:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Umm... Hac55 does exist. See here. You have to type in the user as the user who performed the action (i.e. created the username), not the recipient. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 02:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Yet another frivilous self-nomination from an editor with fewer than 50 article edits. WP:SNOW, please. android79 02:22, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, too few edits. Please consider withdrawing and try again in a few months.Naconkantari e|t||c|m 02:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A. Reverting pages
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A. I am pleased with all my contributions.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A. I have not been in any conflicts. I plan to deal with them by metaphorically dropping tear gas on them.