Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kirill Lokshin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Kirill Lokshin

Final (36/0/0) ended 10:34 29 October 2005

Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs) – Extremly talented user. Maintains the war portal, makes useful edits & contributions, good with graphics, is responsible & is a highly valuable wikipedian.Spawn Man 07:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I humbly (and gratefully) accept! Kirill Lokshin 17:05, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Major Milkshake Support --Spawn Man 07:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support this fine user. --Celestianpower hablamé 17:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support. One of my best buddies from college was named Kirill. But that has no bearing on my vote to support here, which is based on Kirill Lokshin's excellent editing attributes.  BD2412 talk 17:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support very good user --JAranda | watz sup 17:20, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Yes, please. Solid contributions, active on RC patrol, and a talk page full of positive comments. Joyous (talk) 17:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support He isn't already? (cliche I know). -Greg Asche (talk) 18:05, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support. Kirill seems talented and I like battleboxes :). - Darwinek 18:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  8. Support — Kirill is already involved in all the right places. Gareth Hughes 20:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  9. Wholeheartedly support. In fact, was planning to nominate him one of these days! The Minister of War 20:16, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  10. Support Geoff/Gsl 21:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support - per everyone's favourite cliché. --Celestianpower háblame 22:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support I'm not sure if anything really needs to be said. An awesome editor. SoLando (Ta) 23:03, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  13. Support - Anyone maintaining a portal should be an admin. --SFoskett 23:07, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  14. Support. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:07, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support. Shauri smile! 00:49, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  16. Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 01:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  17. Support. I have met Kirill a few times, and it is easy for me to give him my support.--Wiglaf 03:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  18. Say it with me folks, "I thought he was one". Oran e (t) (c) (@) 04:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  19. Strongbad Support I'm in shock...shocked I say..he's not one already. He's been a huge driving force behind Wikipedia:WikiProject Battles and Wikipedia:WikiProject Wars and is now thoughtfully moving the two towards a much needed merger. Wikipedes, let us act promptly to correct this oversight!--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 12:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support See him regularly. Dlyons493 Talk 17:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
  21. FireFox 13:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  22. Support. — ceejayoz talk 19:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  23. Support but I don't know him. V/M
    19:38, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  24. Support --Rogerd 19:45, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  25. --Boothy443 | comhrá 21:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
    Wow! the wub "?!" 22:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  26. Support. I haven't come across him but certainly seems like a very good editor. the wub "?!" 22:13, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  27. Support. Nice work on battles etc. --Briangotts (talk) 19:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
  28. Support -- Francs2000 21:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
  29. Support. El_C 21:45, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
  30. Support --Kefalonia 08:05, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
  31. Support --tomf688{talk} 20:23, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
  32. Support. --Scimitar parley 22:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
  33. Support Johann Wolfgang 17:45, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
  34. Support. --NormanEinstein 19:47, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
  35. -- ( drini's vandalproof page ☎ ) 19:00, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  36. Humorless Support, RfA's are very serious, if anyone makes light of them wikipedia will collapse remember this the next time you see anyone do something like support, if they do that, they should be blocked immediately! Private Butcher 20:12, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I'm already involved in regular RC patrolling (initially by hand, and more recently using Sam Hocevar's "godmode-light" script; the availability of a faster and more reliable rollback button will certainly let me increase my efforts in this. I'm also a big proponent of tidyness, so I would like to help with the general backlogs in various housekeeping tasks (particularly copyvios, in the tagging of which I've occasionaly participated).
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I've only made major contributions to a small number of articles (most of them on fairly obscure episodes of military history); of these, the one I've worked most on and polished the most is War of the League of Cambrai, which I created over the course of several months (starting from three existing stubs).
A larger portion of my work has been related to organizational tasks in areas related to military history. I played a significant role in the return of WikiProject Battles to an active state, as well as creating Portal:War to further increase participation in the subject. In addition, I created and populated many of the sub-categories of Category:Battles by country (as well as bringing the naming of the existing ones to a standard form).
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I was involved in several (admittedly very mild) disagreements in the course of my categorization of battles, related mainly to how certain country categories should be used (and whether they should exist at all). Since I discussed the issue with the other editors in question without reverting to my own changes, these disagreements were resolved in fairly short order, and probably can't be considered real conflicts.
For what it's worth, I've a few attemtps to be more involved in the article content RFCs; for instance, I made some changes in response to a request that were, judging from the lack of further conflict, taken as an acceptable compromise.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.