Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/King Toadsworth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] King Toadsworth

Final (0/3/2); Withdrawn by candidate 12:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

King Toadsworth (talk · contribs) – I believe that my vandal fighting would be easier and more efficient if I am made an Administrator. I wish only to contribute fully to Wikipedia and have committed no intentional offenses.King Toadsworth "The Princess is in Another Castle (Again)" 22:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I Accept fully. I must withdraw for now, but with more experience, I will attempt again someday. King Toadsworth "The Princess is in Another Castle (Again)" 00:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A:I plan to help crack down on vandalism and the perpetrators who cause it. I also plan to contribute to stubbed/orphaned articles and participate further in The Nintendo Wikiproject. I also plan to oust vandalism and prevent/resolve User disputes.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: I am pleased with my stub cleanup/expansion the most, but also my vandalism-fighting history. One of the main reasons I seek to become an admin is because of the vadalism-fighting tools that become accessable.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:I have not currently had any conflicts.
General comments

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Much too early, registered 9 days ago. I'm sorry, but I can't bring myself to a moral support here. Please withdraw. -Amarkov blahedits 01:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Oppose. Your eagerness is appreciated, but with less than 500 edits I cannot support you. Note that being an admin does not stop or aid you from contributing to stubbed articles. I suggest you withdraw. Good luck. --Deskana talk 01:08, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. Sorry it's just too early. TSO1D 01:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Suggest withdrawal -- Samir धर्म 01:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Neutral. So far, you are a very good contributor, and I'm sure you could become an admin in a few months, but you do not enough edits, and not nearly enough experience with the project. Strongly suggest withdrawal. —The Great Llamamoo? 01:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.