Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Juggernaut0102 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] Juggernaut0102

(0/3/0); Closed on behalf of User:Juggernaut0102 by Kevin (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

To explain withdrawal rather than WP:NOTNOW - he placed this I'll consider waiting a long time while I get my skills and edits up to scratch before i get a new rfa on my talk page, which I have taken as a withdrawal by the candidate. Kevin (talk) 09:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Juggernaut0102 (talk · contribs) - Juggernaut0102 (talk) 08:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: I would like to help with speedy deletions, mopping vandalism and participating in some Wiki Projects.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: In my humble opinion, my best contributions are to articles to do with Microsoft Windows, and Microsoft Halo.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I have been in an edit conflict about the Internet Explorer article, but I have discussed it with the other editor on his talk page privately, and we have coolly resolved the 'edit war'. I do not repeatedly revert versions of pages, I choose to take a more civilised approach.

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:
Requests for adminship/Juggernaut0102 Requests for adminship/Juggernaut0102 2 Requests for adminship/Juggernaut0102 3

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Juggernaut0102 before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support
[edit] Oppose
  1. You've barely edited since your last RfA. Please take a look at some of the other active RfAs if you're interested in adminship, but some better advice is to not be. Don't think about adminship. Ignore it. If you're here to build an encyclopedia, adminship will follow. It doesn't work the other way around. giggy (:O) 08:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
  2. Oppose You currently have 213 edits, I would need to see well over 5,000 before I could be confident that you have a broad enough experience level to handle admin tasks. Also, you need to make better use of edit summaries and need to get more involved in all aspects of WP, articles, WP:XFD, WP:AIV, WP:RCP, etc. MBisanz talk 09:09, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
  3. Oppose 213 edits yet you're on your '3rd' self-nom? Edit some more and forget about RfA for a long while. In addition '103' of your edits are to your user page and your edits are rather sporadic. You also claim to want to help fight vandalism, yet there is very little evidence of any such vandal fighting already taking place. You're just too inexperienced and constant self-noms are not a good sign at all. --Tombomp (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutral
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.