Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Imdaking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Imdaking

Vote here (0/4/0) ending 01:43 02 September 2005 (UTC) Imdaking (talk ยท contribs) - I have has contributed alot since his first log on. I has a tenency to be on Wikipedia every single day since I first logged on and will continue to. I can be a good administrator if I'm given the chance--Imdaking 01:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Cancelled. I am exercising the administrative perogative to close nominations that are hopelessly flawed, in this case for lack of experience. Come back when you have more experience and the community has learned to trust you and we will be glad to reconsider. Dragons flight 02:09, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Absolutely not. Just under 150 edits; has never edited the Talk namespace. You clearly don't have even a passing familiarity with admin chores and what they entail, based on your answers. "No profanity" is a not a Wikipedia policy. Andre (talk) 01:58, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Oppose. Very few edits. First edit less than 4 days ago. Try again in 6 months or so. --Chris S. 02:00, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  3. Oppose 151 edits since 23rd august.... sorry. Be sure to try again in a couple of months :) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 02:02, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
  4. Strong oppose, 60 edits? Far far too early. As Andre stated before me, I'm not so sure you have any idea what sysop choses entail. Try again in 6 months. K1Bond007 04:39, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

  • (This comment made after cancellation) Some people above are giving wierd times for reapplication. Please beware of admin inflation, current editcountitis levels are already insanely high at 3 months + 1500 edits. Let's not make that worse! (even so, admins should at least be able to spell... ^^;; ) Come back in 3 months: If you're doing ok then, fair deal! :-) Kim Bruning 10:14, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
Making sure there's no profanity, illegal use of images, or text. Also,that there is no conflict or abuse between users.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
All of wich I contributed I felt pleased with, including all of the Articles I will do and contribute, I will feel pleased with..
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I have been in conflicts, but I think we can resolve the issue if the other user agrees to.