Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hencetalk

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Hencetalk

FINAL (0/4/0); withdrawn per WP:SNOW by EVula at 14:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I have not been around for very long, however, I have been here long enough to know the rules, regulations and policies that all Wikipedia's users must follow. I feel that the number of edit counts does not judge the worthiness of an admin, I feel that if they are mature enough to have the tools, then they should be given the role.

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I intend to follow up on what I have been doing for most of the time here - newpage patroling, I have done this almost exclusively since joining, and I feel that having the ability to delete, and protect pages from recreation as well as blocking repeat offenders would aid my work on wikipedia.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: As I have stated above, I have made my best contributions to newpage patroling, I feel that these are very important, because of the decision to allow anons to create pages Wikipedia needs more people who can actively deal with nonsense pages on sight, and prevent their recreation,

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: No, I have been involved in no conflicts with anyone

[edit] General comments

• Links for Hencetalk: Hencetalk (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Hencetalk before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support

[edit] Oppose

1. Too inexperienced, I'm afraid. Epbr123 13:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
2. I recommend user reads Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship. Lara❤Love 14:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
3. oppose - Not enough experience. --Jeanenawhitney 14:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
4. Oppose The lack of experience is a major concern here. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.