Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gangsta-Easter-Bunny

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Gangsta-Easter-Bunny

Final (1/21/0) ended 02:35, May 13 2006 (UTC)

Gangsta-Easter-Bunny (talk · contribs) – Gansta-Easter-Bunny may be a newer user. But he has never vandalised and has caught a few vandals. And while I took my wikibreak, he helped spread my vandal-fighting idea.Sabertiger 18:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept.--Gangsta-Easter-Bunny 19:17, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Support

  1. I'm afraid I'm going to have to use the dreaded moral support here. -- Jjjsixsix (t)/(c) @ 00:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose You are not there yet, but you will be in a couple of months.--Stco23 22:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  2. Strong oppose Sorry, but with only 283 edits and 5 edits in the main namespace (most of your edits are on your user page), and the fact that you have been a member for only 2 weeks, you are way too inexperienced to become an administrator. SCHZMO ✍ 19:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose, this nomination seems... odd. Sabertiger, I suggest you look at previously-successful RfAs to see the kinds of candidates we're looking for. Gangsta-Easter-Bunny is much too new. --Deathphoenix ʕ 19:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose - You have 5 edits in the article space and just a few hundreds in the remaining namespaces. That's not enough. Keep learning and start writing articles. Cheers! Afonso Silva 19:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  5. Strong Oppose Schzmo sums it up nicely: too inexperienced. Gwernol 20:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  6. Strong oppose per above.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 20:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  7. Strong Oppose per all above. I suggest a b'cat closes per WP:SNOWBALL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Computerjoe (talk • contribs) .
  8. Oppose: too few edits, no edit summary usage. Not ready; keep working, come back when you have 1000+ edits -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 20:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  9. Oppose & Second Closure: Per Computerjoe --Charlie(@CIRL | talk) 20:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  10. Support Withdraw - sorry, I know you have good faith intentions but you're just a tad new -- Tawker 20:27, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  11. Strong Oppose. I strongly suggest you to withdraw this RFA. Your current contributions and experience are not sufficient enough for you to become an administrator. Sorry.—G.He 20:29, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  12. Strong Oppose. Per my comment below, the editor making this nomination has been accused a number of times of vandalism and might be making this nomination for less than legit reasons. While I'm assuming good faith, I strongly suggest this RfA be closed.--Alabamaboy 20:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  13. With apologies to the nominator and nominee, this may be the most obvious WP:SNOW ever. Hope to see you back after several more months of good work on Wiki. RadioKirk talk to me 21:06, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  14. Although it would be interesting to have an admin who claims to be from Mars, I Oppose. He's a way to green. --Tone 21:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  15. Oppose, of course. --Rory096
  16. Oppose, is this some kind of junior high sockpuppet invasion or something? — GT 22:02, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  17. Oppose: don't be silly. Thumbelina 22:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  18. oppose and please just close this it now Yuckfoo 22:51, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  19. Oppose. Not experienced enough. Also is an attention seeker: [1], [2]. I strongly doubt that someone with less than 500 edits would be able to get the highest score on that wikipediaholic test. DarthVader 23:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
    Am I the only one who seems to think that this may be a sock from that diff? --Rory096 23:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  20. Oppose, can a 'crat close this already and end the suffering, please? I think the candidate has taken the point... Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 23:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  21. Strongest possible oppose as per 2 recent vandalisms, <500 edits, not admin material. Admins - even potential admins - are held to a higher standard. — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 00:23, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  22. Oppose oppose oppose oppose - sorry. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

  • NOTE: The editor making this nomination has been accused a number of times of vandalism. I strongly suggest that this nomination be removed b/c it is highly likely it is being done for less then legit reasons. For more info, see User talk:Sabertiger --Alabamaboy 20:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • See Gangsta-Easter-Bunny's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.
  • Editcount using Interiot's tool:
Username        Gangsta-Easter-Bunny
Total edits     283
Distinct pages edited   55
Average edits/page      5.145
First edit      13:43, April 29, 2006
        
(main)  5
User    175
User talk       32
Template        27
Template talk   6
Category        1
Wikipedia       30
Wikipedia talk  7

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I would block repeated vandals, delete stuff that needed deleting, undelete stuff that needed undeleted, and update protected pages.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: I'm not particulary pleased with any... I don't hold up any of my edits higher than anyother.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Yes. I explained to the person I was in the conflict with that I had a point, peacefully. Not changin' my ways...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.